South Dakota's voter-approved
U.S. District Judge Karen Schreier stayed her ruling until the appeals process plays out, but she found South Dakota had wrongly deprived six same-sex couples of their rights. The couples had sought to marry within the state or have their marriages from other states recognized at home.
"Plaintiffs have a fundamental right to marry," Schreier wrote in a 28-page ruling. "South Dakota law deprives them of that right solely because they are same-sex couples and without sufficient justification."
South Dakota Atty. Gen. Marty Jackley has already announced his intention to appeal the ruling.
“It remains the state’s position that the institution of marriage should be defined by the voters of South Dakota and not the federal courts," he said in a statement.
In a Monday afternoon interview with the Los Angeles Times, Jackley said he was one of nearly two dozen attorneys general who asked the U.S. Supreme Court to resolve the issue last year.
The Supreme Court has yet to hear a same-sex marriage case after striking down portions of the