Advertisement

National honor for Chavez?

Share
Times Staff Writer

There are national historic sites that honor the contributions of Revolutionary War heroes, commemorate the birthplace of Abraham Lincoln and even preserve the home of playwright Eugene O’Neill, but none that recognize a Latino.

That may be about to change. The late labor leader Cesar Chavez is the focus of companion bills in Congress that would provide funds for the National Park Service to study how to honor Chavez: Is his story -- decades spent unionizing and improving the working conditions of farmworkers -- best told with a national trail, a historic site or a traditional landscaped park?

The bipartisan bills are under consideration for the first time, despite previous attempts to nudge the proposal out of committee in both houses of Congress, said Rep. Hilda Solis, (D-El Monte), the legislation’s House sponsor.

Advertisement

She noted that few of the 390 sites managed by the Park Service honor the accomplishments of African Americans, Native Americans or Asian Americans.

“It’s time,” Solis said. “We’ve named roads and schools for him; we have a stamp with his portrait on it. It’s not as though this person is someone who hasn’t really earned this recognition.”

A site honoring Chavez would dovetail with an effort by the Park Service to make parks more relevant at a time of declining attendance and low interest among minorities. Park Service Regional Director Jon Jarvis told a gathering in Los Angeles last month that the park system must reflect the evolving demographics of the nation, in part by “telling their stories.”

If the idea is approved, Park Service social scientists will consult with community leaders and make a recommendation to Congress, which has the sole authority to create a park.

The proposal to honor Chavez is not without its opponents. In addition to those who object to the expansion of federal lands and holdings, other critics say Chavez’s legacy is too unsettled.

In his congressional testimony on the bills, Joe R. Hicks, vice president of the L.A.-based civil rights group Community Advocates Inc., said there is no national consensus about Chavez’s contributions.

Advertisement

“I am not before you to argue that Chavez accomplished nothing, or that he is not a person of significance. He clearly is,” said Hicks, a former executive director of the Los Angeles Human Relations Commission. “However, what remains disputable is whether or not his work and beliefs are worthy of recognition by all Americans. Honoring national figures in this way is something that should be carefully considered.”

Solis said that she was puzzled by opposition and that recognition for Chavez and Latinos was overdue.

“We’re the largest minority population; we’re almost not a minority anymore,” she said, adding that her bill is likely to move out of committee at the end of the month. “This is going to take years. But to me, this is already a small victory.”

Chavez was born near his family’s farm near Yuma, Ariz. He and his family became migrant farmworkers after losing their land in the Depression. They relocated to California, and Chavez eventually settled in east San Jose.

Beginning in the 1950s, Chavez worked to organize field workers and formed the National Farm Workers Assn., which later became the United Farm Workers.

His efforts to improve working conditions in the fields led to the California Agricultural Labor Relations Act in 1975, which, among other things, protected farmworkers’ right to organize.

Advertisement

A follower of the nonviolent principles of Mohandas K. Gandhi, Chavez led strikes and boycotts. He sometimes fasted as a form of protest. His campaign to boycott table grapes became a nationally supported movement that lasted five years.

“Cesar Chavez’s legacy and his impact went far beyond the field that he worked in and the farmworkers he worked with. It went to the Midwest and places that never heard of farmworkers,” said Paul S. Park, president of the Cesar E. Chavez Foundation.

Chavez, who was nominated three times for the Nobel Peace Prize, also worked to reduce pesticide use, became a vegetarian and lobbied for animal rights. He died in his sleep in 1993.

*

julie.cart@latimes.com

Advertisement