More than anything Clinton can say, a series of assaults that have taken the lives of more than 500 civilians this year should serve to convince typical Pakistanis that this is not just a U.S. war. The United States and Pakistan have a common enemy in Islamist extremists, and the Pakistani state is fighting for its survival.
Militants around the world have cynically targeted marketplaces to weaken support for governments that fail to protect their people, even though killing innocents rarely wins over public opinion in the long run. That's a point the Obama administration also should note. More than 500 civilians have died in U.S. missile strikes against the Taliban by unmanned drone aircraft, Pakistani officials say, which may partly explain why polls show that a majority of Pakistanis regard the United States as an enemy.
The Peshawar bomb appears to be the work of the Pakistani Taliban, which is fighting not for its brethren in Afghanistan but to destabilize the government of President Asif Ali Zardari. Officials regard the bombing as retaliation for a 30,000-troop Pakistani military offensive in the Taliban stronghold of South Waziristan. Despite his many shortcomings, Zardari sounds as if he understands that he has no choice but to fight back. We hope that the often-ambivalent Pakistani army is convinced it must continue the offensive and ultimately defeat the Pakistani Taliban. Opposition leader Nawaz Sharif also should speak out against the bombing and help unify the country against radicals who want to control it.
The United States is aiding Pakistan's military with hundreds of millions of dollars worth of weapons, helicopters and surveillance equipment, and U.S. Special Forces soldiers are training Pakistani counterinsurgency troops. All of this is done under the radar, so to speak, to avoid a backlash against the United States. But while it's true that the Obama administration, like the Bush administration before it, is shoring up the nuclear-armed Pakistani government to protect U.S. interests and those of its allies, it's also time for Pakistanis to acknowledge that it's in their interest as well to keep extremists at bay. This is Pakistan's conflict too.
Digg
Twitter
Facebook
StumbleUpon
It is a policy of carrot and donkey and not a policy of building relationship. Being a Pakistani I have seen many dictators come and go, not just in Pakistan but else where as well.
As long as the dictator was able to build perception with US policy makers that he is the best person to protect US interests, he has always been showered with $$$ (remember Musharraf, Saddam, King of Iran, Castro (when he took power), etc. ). It is only when he is no longer considered "acceptable" that US uses the sword of democracy and replace him with their new favorite person, and the country has to pass through an extended period of misery for this change.
Does anyone remember that Saddam was supported by US for so many years when he fought with Iran and was responsible for death of '000? Taliban were not created by Pakistan? They were created to oust the mujahideen who had defeated USSR, as their purpose was served and the enemy has been beaten. However as these were unacceptable to US, they had to go!
I look at my country with innocent paying for the strategic actions of US policy makers - millions of miles away in their cosy homes debating how to be more ASSERTIVE with the Pakistani govt. I can only pray that Obama realizes the mistakes of his predecessors (although unlikely given so many issues to tackle at home front - from declining popularity to H/care bill) and spare Pakistan!
FaisalAMalik (11/03/2009, 2:34 PM )