REWRITING THE RULES

Bush rewrites the rules

Last-minute changes being pushed through by the administration, such as altering H-2A visa rules, are creating disasters that Barack Obama will have to reverse beginning Jan. 20.
December 16, 2008

» Discuss Article    (4 Comments)

The anticipation is almost unbearable. For some, it seems as if Dec. 25 will never come. Others can hardly wait for Sunday and the start of eight days of miraculous light and celebration. And for those whose gifts arrive with camels and kings, the lapse between now and Jan. 6 feels like an eternity. To the season of yearning we now add Jan. 20. That's when President Bush will finally set down his pen.

Not content to leave office as the most unpopular president in recent history, Bush is cementing his legacy of hardheaded autocracy by pushing through a record number of last-minute and particularly noxious changes in federal regulations. Bypassing congressional debate and often receiving public comments through government websites, the administration has in recent months issued dozens of "midnight regulations" that in some cases could take years to reverse. This isn't just leaving a stamp on the country, it's more like inking a tattoo.

Although other presidents have crafted rules the next administration might not, none has been so aggressive or destructive as Bush. His administration has attacked environmental safeguards, reproductive rights and public safety. It has acted to permit uranium mining near the Grand Canyon, curtail women's access to birth control, allow visitors to carry loaded guns in national parks -- which are among the safest public places in the country -- and open millions of acres of unspoiled land to mining.

Last week, the Department of Labor weakenedthe nation's already flawed agricultural guest worker program. The new H-2A visa rules, which take effect in January, revise the way wages are calculated and will lower them substantially. In California, farmworker advocates say, the current $9.72 hourly wage would drop by 18%. The new rules also reduce requirements for growers to prove they have made a good-faith effort to recruit U.S. workers and limit how much they have to reimburse workers for their trips home. This is precisely what opponents of immigration reform feared: policies that disadvantage citizens and encourage the easy exploitation of migrants

Furthermore, the changes won't even narrow the labor gap. In California, only about 1% of the state's 450,000 farmworkers are recruited through the H-2A visa program, and growers say the rule changes won't help them; they'll continue to push for the Agricultural Job Opportunities, Benefits and Security Act, a bipartisan effort that would free migrant workers to move among employers and eventually allow them to gain legal status and become U.S. citizens.

Once Barack Obama is sworn in, he'll have the power to clean up these regulatory disasters. That alone makes Jan. 20 feel like Christmas, Hanukkah and Three Kings Day rolled into one.




Post Comment

Name
Enter your comments and post to forum
By participating you agree to our Terms of Service and represent that you are not under the age of 13.
 
Discussion


Comments will close after two days.
 
1. Chronic Bush-bashing Syndrome, endemic at the Times, results in focusing on Bush instead of examining the issue. It is a technical matter; the editorial presents only the Farmworkers' Union POV. It is fatuous to promote the "bipartisan" AJOBS Act as as a solution. Emphasis on a path to citizenship for temporary workers makes it a non-starter -- it violates the priority of our immigration concerns. We can't debate citizenship for temporary workers before resolving the regularization of longterm undocumented residents, a necessary precedent to meaningful workplace enforcement with the Employment Eligibility Verification System.
Submitted by: William R. Snaer, D.D.S.
1:33 PM PST, Dec 16, 2008
 
2. Let’s get this straight; the LA Times is against the guest worker programs that allow people to work here and then go back home, although guest workers seek higher wages instead of a “better life”. The Times want them to stay so badly that it validates the arguments of the opponents of illegal immigration, those racists, xenophobes, etc. This drive to increase the Mexican voting population in this country cannot explained by the needs of the illegal workers, the farmers, and certainty not by the taxpayers. I conclude that there is a sadio-masochistic need by the LA Times to share the California experience with the rest of the country.
Submitted by: Ransome
11:54 AM PST, Dec 16, 2008
 
3. GWB has again poisoned the well to the detriment of the people he is supposed to be serving. And he probably doesn't even know it.
Submitted by: Richard Beldin
11:28 AM PST, Dec 16, 2008
 




Op-Ed: Cutting fraud and waste won't solve the entire budget mess, but it needs to be done, the governor says.


   
The best in Southern California opinion journalism
Poll: Should Sarah Palin have resigned?
Gov. Sarah Palin just announced that she will not be seeking re-election for her...
more
The business and culture of our digital lives, from the L.A. Times
A big week for copyrights and piracy
The sale of The Pirate Bay probably ranks as the week's biggest news for those...
more
 

ADVERTISEMENT


ADVERTISEMENT