AMERICAN VALUES AND THE NEXT PRESIDENT

'A more perfect union'

The first in a series of editorials examining American values and the candidates for president.
December 10, 2007

» Discuss Article    (33 Comments)

American values were born before the United States of America. The act of venturing to a new world, leaving behind the customs and allegiances of the past, created an American mind-set and an American society based on the rights of the individual. By the time of the Declaration of Independence, the truths about which Thomas Jefferson wrote really were self-evident: All men -- all human beings -- are created equal, with the "unalienable" right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. The nation was created to respect, and protect, those truths.

The Constitution set out to create "a more perfect union," a concept that at the time was given to mean a better cooperation among the 13 young states. But "union," over the decades, came to be understood as the forging of an American people and creed out of not merely many states but many people from many lands of origin, cultures and faiths. Perfecting that union meant cutting away its tragic hypocrisies: slavery, racial segregation, subordination of women, inequality before the law. Perfection recedes inexorably beyond reach as the decades bring new challenges, but faith in perfectibility and the process of pursuing it propels America forward and keeps fresh its founding principles.

 
Every election is an exercise in perfecting our union. We seek leaders with talent, experience and wisdom who will guide the nation through demanding times while upholding its values. As we sift through presidential candidates and platforms in the 2008 campaign, we will examine the basic American principles and challenge ourselves -- and the candidates -- to articulate how as president they would work to perfect the nation in the service of its inhabitants' unalienable rights. We begin those examinations with this editorial, to be followed in coming days and weeks by elaborations on the issues that define this campaign in the context of the values that shape this nation.

To begin: We respect candidates who speak plainly about their faith, and we acknowledge the bonds some voters feel toward leaders who profess the same religious beliefs as theirs, but we are wary of candidates who seek favor and power by promising to magnify the presence of religion in American law and life and to engraft religious precepts onto the Constitution. We reject the assertion, made earlier in the campaign by Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.), that the Constitution established a Christian nation, and hold instead that it established a nation of laws that protect freedom to adhere to and practice religious faith according to individual conscience. In conflicts between individual liberties and social or religious values -- such as the ability of any two adults to marry even if their union is not sanctioned by religious establishments or self-appointed experts -- we side with the individual.

We seek candidates who can distinguish between eternal values and mere tradition. A 21st century American president should not lead as though it were still the 1800s, and as though the nation had endless lands to exploit and oceans and skies too vast to be harmed by industry. The nation can ill-afford a wistful and self-indulgent descent into frontier-era thinking, and should instead recognize the perfect consistency between careful stewardship of resources and a continued exploration of the frontiers of human ingenuity. The United States must have a president open to science and aware of the planet's limits.

On the issue of new arrivals to this country -- those who enter legally and those who enter or stay without permission -- we acknowledge the clash between our support for new Americans seeking opportunity and our respect for the rule of law. We look for a president with the intelligence and leadership to square law with economic and social reality, giving us laws that protect both our borders and the ability of newcomers to continue the American story. We dismiss anxiety over the fate of our language and culture, knowing that they are not only strong but further strengthened by new blood and new thinking.

We expect a president to be unafraid to explore ways to erase injustice and promote each American's opportunity to learn and to achieve, and to be equally unafraid to end experiments that prove unproductive or that infringe on the liberty of others. We expect a president to be committed to the ongoing project of perfecting the union.

Next: "Life" explores abortion, stem cell research and the death penalty. The complete "American Values" series and an explanation of it can be found at latimes.com/values08 and at the Opinion L.A. blog. Each editorial will be posted upon publication.




Post Comment

Name
Enter your comments and post to forum
By participating you agree to our Terms of Service and represent that you are not under the age of 13.
 
Discussion


Tell us your thoughts on "A more perfect union."
 
1. Your appraisal of American values skirts reality. Thomas Jefferson in 1800 owned more than 287 slaves. American society was far too racist to be based on equality or individual rights, as you state. As late as the 1990s, there were neighborhoods that barred African Americans, Native Americans and Latinos. America's social problems are problems caused by whites who still deny full civil rights and social equality to other races and non-Christians. We need a president who can help bring us together -- in every way.
Submitted by: Phil Hoffman
1:10 PM PST, Dec 19, 2007
 
2. Economists now realize that sheer numbers of people don't make for prosperity. Most Americans themselves have limited themselves to small families in order to provide the best for their children and with the thought maintain a sustainable quality of life for their progeny. It is time for the Times to abandon its infatuation with immigration policies that may have made sense a century and a half ago, but today are as anachronistic as the editorials praise of 'new blood.'
Submitted by: Mitchell Young
3:28 AM PST, Dec 15, 2007
 
3. This is terific! Ihope and expect the future ones to be as good. I am saving them ,in a special file, to use in the discussion group on current events at the senior residence where I live. It would make an excellent set of lessons for high school history and government classes.
Submitted by: Jack M. Staus
9:12 AM PST, Dec 13, 2007
 



The senator's Berlin speech was radical and naive.

   
The best in Southern California opinion journalism, Monday through Friday
Former Timesman finally makes good
At the L.A. Times it often seems that the only kind of colleagues we have are...
more »
Jon Healey on Hollywood's love-hate relationship with technology.
A Paramount movie integrated into Sony web programming
This is so meta, I'm having trouble wrapping my brain around it. Today Bebo...
more »
 

ADVERTISEMENT



The Tottori Sand Museum in Japan is showcasing sculptures of UNESCO World Heritage sites in Asia.