BLOWBACK

Don’t trust, verify

A weak secret court is to blame for abuses of foreign surveillance.
By Timothy Rieger
February 8, 2008
» Discuss Article    (23 Comments)

The recent L.A. Times editorial "Trust, but verify," regarding the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act reform proposals now advancing through Congress, rightly notes that the term "foreign intelligence" casts too "wide a net to leave to the discretion of an administration, especially one that has shown we can't trust its judgment."

The problem is that the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court itself — a secretive, non-adversarial court that has rejected only a handful of government wiretap requests in its 30-year history — provides absolutely no basis on which the American people can trust its judgment to protect them from abusive government conduct. The court's necessary secrecy prohibits it from disclosing its legal rationales for granting search warrants to government agents. Thus it is grossly misleading for critics of President Bush's domestic spying program to suggest that a court that the citizens cannot hear, see or even understand is sufficient to restrain the tyrannical impulses of the executive branch. We simply have no basis to believe that such impulses have been and are being restrained.

Because of its secrecy and non-adversarial nature, the FISA court fails to act as a sufficient bulwark against the tyrannical impulses of the executive branch. As such, Congress must create a corollary court that would be open, adversarial and invite civic participation in the affairs of the executive branch. This special court would allow citizens to remove unconfirmed U.S. government officials — who, unlike their confirmed colleagues, cannot be impeached — if it is found they engaged in malicious or politically motivated conduct.

This special court would be established through the constitutional process handed down to us by our founding fathers. The constitutional amendment establishing this court would place parameters on the definition of "civil officers of the United States" in Article II, Section Four. Under the amendment, only those government officials who have been confirmed by the Senate would be conferred with the title of "civil officer," while all other unconfirmed employees of the executive branch would be deemed "civil servants." Civil officers would continue to be subject to the impeachment and removal process, while civil servants would be subject to the jurisdiction of this special court, and indeed the citizens themselves. Any unconfirmed U.S. government employee attempting to use their station for malicious or politically motivated purposes — as, sadly, many in our government have done — would be identified and brought before this panel of federal judges who would determine whether to bar that individual from government service.

We've finally left behind a year during which virtually every nook and cranny of the U.S. Justice Department was politicized. Two months ago, the U.S. intelligence community attempted to throw a Persian rug over the Iranian nuclear weapons program — because certain officials determined that proliferation of such weapons is much ado about nothing. At this point, for any member of Congress — Democrat or Republican — to suggest that unconfirmed U.S. government employees are beyond malicious or politically motivated conduct is an insult to the intelligence of the American people.

If our nation is to arrive at that still-elusive balance between security and civil liberties, we must expand and modernize the basic biology of American government — removal from office by another branch — throughout the executive branch, not continue to live with the illusion that angel wings magically grow on the backs of government employees.

Timothy Rieger is a former congressional lobbyist for the U.S. Campaign to Free Mordechai Vanunu.




Post Comment

Name
Enter your comments and post to forum
By participating you agree to our Terms of Service and represent that you are not under the age of 13.
 
Discussion


Does Congress need to establish a corollary to the FISA court? Discuss today's Blowback.

Comments will close after two weeks.
 
1. RW has a lot of ???????. I would to hear his answers.
Submitted by: Just Me
3:40 AM PST, Feb 13, 2008
 
2. President Bush and his administration have shown time and time again that they will circumvent current pracices at their own imperial whim. What is needed is adherence to current laws, courts, and rules of civil rights. It is not the job of this administration to rewrite law, but to obey it. Somewhere along the line people in the White House decided that they were the creators and changers of laws of justice and military and civilian interrogation practices. They have disregarded the Geneva Convention rules of conflict and interrogation and imprisonment repeatedly. This is not about partisan politics.
Submitted by: Obey The Law
8:19 PM PST, Feb 12, 2008
 
3. What's really important is getting people to realize the danger we are in by allowing govement to rule our lives. And....voting for anyone of the top people in the running now for president will surly put us over the edge. Every day I listen to the news both political and otherwise and I am so discussted by the reaction of so called democrats. It's all kissy and oh poor thing. I am so fed up with the way the country makes everything complicated. Get the damn aliens out of here - no more bennies, they are draining the system. Say no to Mexico - they are trying to push us to become part of a North American Union. Are you still an American?
Submitted by: LAK
6:34 PM PST, Feb 11, 2008
 




Jonah Goldberg: Citing recently published comments, the columnist wonders whether the justice believes some populations need to be reduced through abortion.


   
The best in Southern California opinion journalism
In today's pages: Reform for all!
In today's pages: reform. Reform of the health care system, reform of...
more
The business and culture of our digital lives, from the L.A. Times
SuperFan, taking affinities further
Social networks are partly about broadcasting information to a far-flung...
more
 

ADVERTISEMENT


ADVERTISEMENT