DUST-UP

Shades of blue

Is the American left now a movement of economic issues and nationalism, of identity politics and social justice, or something else? How do the New Democrats fit into the contemporary left? Jasmyne Cannick and Rick Perlstein discuss.
March 13, 2008

» Discuss Article    (48 Comments)

Today, Cannick and Perlstein discuss the ideological spectrum within the Democratic Party. Previously, they weighed the causes of the party's apparent national strength, assessed the compatibility of progressive politics and traditional religious values, and discussed whether Democrats have co-opted national security as a campaign plank from the Republicans. Tomorrow, they'll debate the prospects of a long-term Democratic ascendancy.

Ideological diversity is good for the party

I think that most, if not all, Democrats would agree that priority No. 1 is ridding the county of this catastrophic administration and ensuring that we don't endure another four years of conservative policymaking under right-wing power.

With that said, the modern American left, in my opinion, often serves as the conscience of the Democratic Party. Today's left is very much a movement of economic and social justice.

How do the New Democrats fit into the contemporary left?

I'm not sure that I buy into the notion that the New Democrats have to fit into the modern left movement. I would argue that both are necessary, as they both add to the party. They act as a sort of checks-and-balances system for the party.

New Democrats have been described as the modernization of liberalism with a heavy focus on progressive policies. At the center of their platform is economic growth versus redistribution. This is followed by traditional American values -- personal responsibility, individual liberty, faith, tolerance, family and hard work. New Democrats want both an activist government and for those who benefit from government to give something back to their country and community. It was a message that evidently resonated with American voters in 1992 with the election of Bill Clinton, who championed the New Democrat philosophy.

But that was 1992, and 16 years later, we see the left's movement invigorated with new life, thanks in part of the horrible policies of the Bush administration.

With America in a recession that no one wants to call by its proper name, a national mortgage crisis, an immigration emergency, a war that won't end and more Americans uninsured and unemployed, the message of economic and social justice for all is resonating loud and clear with many Americans who feel the effects of the current administration.

The role of the left as the party's conscience will be particularly important as we head into the 2008 convention in Denver to select a nominee. As the Democratic Party attempts to send American voters the message that it will provide national security and economic growth, you can count on the left to be front and center waving the banner for ending the Iraq war, defending our civil liberties, ensuring economic justice and universal healthcare, and fighting global warming. In other words, the left will continue to hold the party accountable and push forward a real progressive agenda.

Once we have our nominee, it will be up to the Democratic Party as a whole to put aside ideological differences for the time being and focus on the most effective strategy to capture the White House in November. That crucial goal is where all Democrats' focus should be, regardless of where we fall on the political spectrum within our party.

Jasmyne Cannick is a critic based in Los Angeles who writes about pop culture, race, class and politics as played out in the African American community. She is a regular contributor to National Public Radio's "News and Notes."


Is The Times kidding?

In one of his many fantastical short stories, the Argentine fiction writer Jorge Luis Borges describes "a certain Chinese encyclopedia," the Celestial Emporium of Benevolent Knowledge, which divides the world's animals into the following categories:

1. Those that belong to the emperor.
2. Embalmed ones.




Post Comment

Name
Enter your comments and post to forum
By participating you agree to our Terms of Service and represent that you are not under the age of 13.
 
Discussion


How would you describe the politics of the modern Democratic Party? Discuss round four of this week's Dust-Up.

Comments will close after two weeks.
 
1. I like Perlstein's opening; giving an example before tackling a difficult concept is a good beginning. George Lakoff;s premise about limiting an issue by defining it in prejudicial terms is certainly alive and well at the Times.
Submitted by: cephalis
11:27 AM PDT, Mar 15, 2008
 
2. anther detached writer, the left of today and yesterday is the same, socialist, facist, the elite left which wants to rule, rather than lead, i want to make my own way, leave the dems on the side , keep my taxes low get, govt off my bosses ass!! kill the jihadist, today, tonight , tommorow,
Submitted by: greg
11:21 AM PDT, Mar 15, 2008
 
3. Framing questions and diluting our language has led us to this place where reality is very rarely grasped and our ability to communicate clearly and argue merits is but a sideshow performance of freaks and fairies. Defining terms only involves good or bad and then it is bleated far and wide. Grunting is creative discourse if it's done at a high enough decibel.
Submitted by: ebonkreig
9:27 AM PDT, Mar 15, 2008
 




Steven Landsburg says owners are walking away. Doug Henwood says it's not that simple. Discuss 

   
The best in Southern California opinion journalism, Monday through Friday
Should he? Would he? Could he?
California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger cuts state workers' pay to minimum wage;...
more »
Jon Healey on Hollywood's love-hate relationship with technology.
Yahoo pulls an MSN Music (only faster)
This afternoon, Yahoo alerted customers of its erstwhile downloadable music...
more »
 

ADVERTISEMENT



One morning's cooking means deliciousness well into the week. Recipe