Opinion
Get Opinion in your inbox -- sign up for our weekly newsletter
Opinion Editorial
Editorial

Regulating e-cigarettes: It's about time

The lack of research on e-cigarettes is a major impediment to shaping meaningful regulations
E-cigarettes might save tens of thousands of lives each year
The FDA and the National Institutes of Health should make research on e-cigarettes a top priority

It has taken far too long for the U.S. Food and Drug Administration to impose regulations on e-cigarettes: More than three years have passed since it announced its intention to do so. During that time, the devices have caught on with teenagers, whose use of them doubled from 2011 to 2012. And the rules proposed Thursday will not be finalized for at least another year.

The new regulations are appropriately strong in many ways, banning sales to minors and requiring the disclosure of ingredients as well as evidence for any marketing claims that e-cigarettes are healthier than traditional cigarettes. But more is needed.

To the extent that they are used by people who would otherwise smoke regular cigarettes, e-cigarettes might save tens of thousands of lives each year. That's because the devices deliver the nicotine that smokers crave via vapor, without the smoke that causes cancer and other illnesses.

On the other hand, because the vapor doesn't irritate the throat and lungs the way regular tobacco products do, e-cigarettes might serve as a gateway to smoking for teenagers. Recent sales figures among minors indicate that is already happening. The lack of research on e-cigarettes is a major impediment to shaping meaningful regulations.

The FDA did not overreach. It did not attempt to restrict the advertising of e-cigarettes on television. At the same time, it plans to ensure that e-cigarette companies cannot make lavish claims that their product is less dangerous than cigarettes or that e-cigarettes can help smokers quit the habit, unless they provide evidence for those claims.

More important, the rules would ban sales to minors. But because advertising is considered a matter of free speech, the FDA did not prohibit the marketing of the devices to teenagers. Before it can do that, the agency must have stronger evidence that e-cigarettes harm young people. That's a shame, because the manufacturers have been advertising in magazines popular with teens and sponsoring rock concerts.

Above all, the FDA and the National Institutes of Health should make research on e-cigarettes a top priority. Sales are soaring, and only with better evidence can rules be crafted that recognize whatever health advantages e-cigarettes might offer while minimizing possible downsides.

Copyright © 2015, Los Angeles Times
Related Content
  • The haze around e-cigarettes

    The haze around e-cigarettes

    It's not yet certain whether 'vaping' is dangerous. But policymakers are deciding now whether to regulate e-cigarettes.

  • The global grip of cigarette smoking

    The global grip of cigarette smoking

    Just 18% of Americans smoke, but worldwide, there are now 1 billion smokers.

  • The 50-year war on smoking

    The 50-year war on smoking

    The U.S. Surgeon General's 1964 report on the mortal dangers of tobacco was a progressive document for its time, but much remains to be done.

  • Camels: 100 years and still killing

    Camels: 100 years and still killing

    The first modern cigarette arrived in 1913, a mild and sweet blend delivered in a neat pack. A century later, there's not much to party about.

  • Jumping on the anti-Confederacy bandwagon

    Jumping on the anti-Confederacy bandwagon

    It’s perfectly reasonable for Americans to take down Confederate flags flapping aside Old Glory on public buildings. The flag has become a symbol of racism that still endures in parts of America more than 150 years after the Civil War ended.

  • How Greek was Alexander the Great?

    How Greek was Alexander the Great?

    Alexander the Great was the first global celebrity: a hero, a superman and, so he believed, a god. Not only did he rule most of the known world at the time of his death in 323 BC, he also became a model of paranoid absolutism for all the Caesars and Kaisers and czars to come.

Comments
Loading