Opinion
Reading Los Angeles: Join The Times' new book club
Opinion Editorial

Democrats bust the filibuster, and good for them

After years of dithering, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) on Thursday finally triggered the so-called nuclear option and pushed through a change of rules that will allow the vast majority of presidential nominations to be confirmed if they are supported by a simple majority. The filibuster has been busted — and a good thing too.

The inside-the-Beltway question about Thursday's "explosion" is whether the Republicans had it coming. They did. After Reid drew back from the nuclear option in July in exchange for Republican acquiescence in the confirmation of some executive branch nominees, the GOP leadership decided to filibuster three more of President Obama's nominees, this time to the influential U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Republicans feared, not irrationally, that the Obama appointments would tilt the court leftward.

Unable to quarrel with the nominees' stellar credentials, Republicans opposed them on the pretext that the D.C. Circuit was underworked and didn't need more judges. One by one, Obama's choices were denied the 60 votes needed for their nominations to proceed. That was too much for Reid. So on Thursday, he dusted off the nuclear option. Henceforth senators won't be able to filibuster presidential nominees, with the exception of candidates for the Supreme Court.

PHOTOS: Famous filibusters (and a bonus -- a recipe for fried oysters)

We welcome this action not because it represents a comeuppance for arrogant Republicans but because filibustering presidential nominees is undemocratic and violates the spirit if not the letter of the Constitution, which says that the president shall appoint judges and other officials "by and with the advice and consent of the Senate" — not by and with a supermajority of the Senate. This isn't a new position for this page. We advocated the nuclear option in 2005, when Republicans were threatening to "go nuclear" to stymie Democratic filibusters of judges nominated by President George W. Bush.

In recent years, the original, stem-winding filibuster mutated into a "filibuster lite" that allowed senators in the minority to block a vote on a nominee without having to engage in marathon speechmaking. A once-rare form of obstruction became commonplace. Now a minority of senators will be free to vote against a president's nominees but not to prevent a vote from being taken. That's a victory not just for the Democrats but for good government.

Copyright © 2015, Los Angeles Times
Related Content
  • Six famous filibusters (and a bonus -- a recipe for fried oysters)
    Six famous filibusters (and a bonus -- a recipe for fried oysters)

    In the face of ongoing obstruction by Republicans, Senate Democrats voted Nov. 21 to bar filibusters on presidential nominees (except for Supreme Court justices). The filibuster will still be available on proposed legislation, such as immigration or appropriations bills. Here's a look at some of...

  • Harry Reid busts the filibuster
    Harry Reid busts the filibuster

    He did it. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, once a defender of Senate tradition, triggered the so-called nuclear option Thursday by pushing through a rule change to allow the confirmation of most presidential nominees by a simple majority. The final straw was the Republicans' filibustering of...

  • Senate Democrats rewrite the filibuster rule. Now what?
    Senate Democrats rewrite the filibuster rule. Now what?

    The sight of Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) using procedural legerdemain to weaken the filibuster rule Thursday must have sent Robert C. Byrd spinning in his grave.

  • Carolyn Ramsay for L.A. Council District 4
    Carolyn Ramsay for L.A. Council District 4

    The race to replace longtime City Councilman Tom LaBonge started out promisingly — there were 14 candidates from inside politics and out, some more serious than others, but enough who were smart, enterprising and scrappy. Now, after an appallingly low turnout primary in a district known for its...

  • Bill on drug pricing would help state in figuring healthcare costs
    Bill on drug pricing would help state in figuring healthcare costs

    A new crop of specialty drugs holds great promise for treating or even curing some devastating diseases, but their high cost challenges health insurers and taxpayer-funded health programs. In California, Gov. Jerry Brown has asked for $300 million in the coming fiscal year's budget just for specialty...

  • Should L.A. really manage the Greek Theatre?
    Should L.A. really manage the Greek Theatre?

    The city of Los Angeles, which has enough problems getting the streets paved and the trash picked up, may now be getting into the concert business. Earlier this month, after a nasty, political fight over which of two entertainment giants should be awarded the multimillion-dollar contract to operate...

  • Shorter showers? Nine more ways the state has to change its water ways
    Shorter showers? Nine more ways the state has to change its water ways

    Heading into the fourth summer of drought, water agencies are looking for ways to get Californians to conserve at home. Tear out lawns. Install low-flow toilets. Irrigate with gray water. But what should the whole state be doing? Opinion asked nine water experts what needs to change about how California...

  • Evolving awareness is cause for same-sex-marriage optimism in court
    Evolving awareness is cause for same-sex-marriage optimism in court

    On Tuesday, the Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in the Ohio case of Obergefell vs. Hodges, as well as three related cases from Kentucky, Michigan and Tennessee. The court is then expected to decide whether the Constitution requires states to grant gay people the same rights in marriage as...

Comments
Loading