Opinion
Join The Times' book club. This month's selection: "Cadillac Desert"
Opinion Editorial
Editorial

Destruction of Syrian chemical weapons shows the U.S. may know what it's doing after all

A rare bit of good news: U.S. has 'finished neutralizing' hundreds of tons of Syrian chemical weapons
There is ongoing concern about the use of chlorine gas in opposition-held areas of Syria
Diplomacy is a better alternative to what would otherwise have been airstrikes in Syria

Disparate, simultaneous crises around the world have put the Obama administration's foreign policy on trial in recent weeks. The forward march of Islamic State insurgents in Iraq has led to renewed military action in the very country the president so vehemently sought to leave when he took office. In Israel and Gaza, the limitations of American power have been on full display, as Secretary of State John F. Kerry returned from peace talks empty-handed and Israel began a bloody offensive against Hamas militants. In Ukraine, the U.S. has failed to prevent Russian President Vladimir Putin from trying to destabilize the country.

So it was a rare bit of good news to hear from the administration on Monday that the United States had "finished neutralizing" hundreds of tons of the most deadly chemical weapons belonging to the regime of President Bashar Assad of Syria. This was a milestone in the diplomatic process that began a year ago this week when the Assad government was accused of using sarin gas to kill more than 1,000 people in a rebel-held suburb near Damascus. Obama had previously promised that the use of chemical weapons in the country's civil war would constitute a "red line" for the U.S., and would change his "calculus." So when the accusations were leveled — and confirmed — the president was under enormous pressure to punish Syria militarily.

But rather than launch airstrikes, as he had prepared to do, Obama agreed at the last minute to a Russian proposal under which Syria would voluntarily surrender its chemical weapons for destruction. Conservatives assailed the plan as naive and feckless, as a projection of American weakness; Obama's supporters called it a fulfillment of his campaign promise to negotiate with those who were willing to talk in good faith. This page said it would not be easy and would require strict verification, but that "an agreement that would truly put Syria's chemical weapons 'beyond use' would be a preferable alternative to military action."

On Monday, Obama said the destruction of the weapons — including 600 tons of sarin and mustard agents eliminated aboard the Cape Ray, an American military cargo ship in the Mediterranean Sea — "sends a clear message that the use of these abhorrent weapons has consequences."

It would be foolish to declare the mission accomplished. As Kerry himself pointed out, there are still "discrepancies and omissions" to be addressed in the information Syria has provided about its weapons arsenal. Furthermore, Syria still has "production facilities" that must be destroyed. And there is ongoing concern about the use of chlorine gas in opposition-held areas.

But this week's announcement was promising, and we are inclined to reiterate our position that negotiation and diplomacy are a better alternative to what would otherwise have been airstrikes followed by likely civilian deaths and a worrisome creep toward war.

Follow the Opinion section on Twitter @latimesopinion

Copyright © 2015, Los Angeles Times
Related Content
  • Opinion newsletter: Much ado about a minimum wage

    Opinion newsletter: Much ado about a minimum wage

    Good morning. I'm Paul Thornton, The Times' letters editor, and sadly, no one voted for a raise for me this week. It is Saturday, May 23, and here’s a look at the last week in Opinion. Subscribe to the newsletter Good news, Los Angeles: About 800,000 people who work here will likely get a raise,...

  • Operation Jade Helm: Crank up the conspiracies

    Operation Jade Helm: Crank up the conspiracies

    Some of the good folks in nine Southern states have their camo knickers in a twist over the U.S. military's Operation Jade Helm.

  • A look at the nation's leftward shift on social issues

    A look at the nation's leftward shift on social issues

    With the nation’s political discourse seemingly as polarized as ever here in the early going of the 2016 presidential campaign, a new Gallup poll finds that people who self-describe their attitudes on social issues as liberal or conservative have reached parity at 31% each. It’s the first time...

  • How the city controller race led to revelations about DWP nonprofits

    How the city controller race led to revelations about DWP nonprofits

    If you ever wonder whether elections really matter, here is an example of why they do. Last month, City Controller Ron Galperin released an audit detailing how employees of two nonprofit trusts associated with the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power were living large on ratepayer money.

  • Rewrite body camera bill or put it aside

    Rewrite body camera bill or put it aside

    As body-worn cameras become standard gear for California's police officers, it's wise to have smart policy regulating how the cameras and the video they produce are used. Such as, when should cameras be turned on and off? What rights should folks not suspected of a crime have to prohibit being...

  • California Senate panel should let right-to-die bill move forward

    California Senate panel should let right-to-die bill move forward

    As polls have shown consistently, a strong majority of Californians believe that terminally ill people should be able to end their lives peacefully and without pain when death is near. The state's residents have waited too long; they have watched for nearly 20 years as a right-to-die law in Oregon...

Comments
Loading