OpinionOp-Ed
Op-Ed

1994 in the Rose Bowl -- when soccer met Prop. 187

CommentaryOpinionPoliticsSoccerElectionsMigrationIllegal Immigrants
How a 1994 U.S.-Mexico soccer game helped fuel Prop. 187
California today is not the same state that passed Prop. 187 in 1994

 

It's no coincidence that we're observing the 20th anniversaries of the last time the World Cup was played in the United States and of the passage of Proposition 187, the initiative enacted by California voters to withhold public services to anyone in the country illegally. In fact, they are inextricably connected. The days when "the world came to the Rose Bowl" for soccer helped fuel the xenophobic backlash that ensured passage of the controversial measure with nearly 60% of the vote.

With the U.S. team advancing further in the World Cup this year than many had expected, global soccer has finally gone mainstream in America. However, in 1994, the audience for the finals in Pasadena was largely confined to international visitors, American Youth Soccer Organization families and immigrants from nations where soccer is as central to national identity as football is to the United States.

In June of that year, on the eve of World Cup competition, nearly 100,000 fans crowded into the Rose Bowl to watch an exhibition game featuring the United States' team and Mexico's national team. The vast majority of the friendly fans were rooting for the Mexican team. I was there, and the Rose Bowl was awash in red, white and green Mexican flags.

It was not a stellar year for the Mexican team. It fell to the U.S., 1-0, in that match, then lost three games and did not make it to the quarterfinals of the World Cup. But those waving Mexican flags would play a crucial role in how the debate over Proposition 187 played out.

The anti-immigrant initiative was a poorly drafted product of a fringe group. The petition drive was launched by an unemployed accountant, who claimed he'd been cheated in a business deal by an illegal immigrant (from Canada), and a former police crime analyst who said she was galvanized by a visit to a social services agency where she walked into "this monstrous room full of people, babies and little children all over the place, and I realized nobody was speaking English."

Proposition 187 would never had qualified for the ballot without the brazen opportunism of then-Gov. Pete Wilson. Trailing challenger Kathleen Brown in early polls during his reelection campaign, Wilson threw his support behind the measure.

At the time, California had taken a hard fall in the final days of the George H.W. Bush administration. A real estate bubble had burst, and the end of the Cold War brought devastation to the local aerospace industry. The riots over the verdict in the Rodney King beating case, gang violence and a series of natural disasters cast a long shadow over the California dream. Voters were in an angry mood, and whether their hostility would focus on the incumbent Republican governor or faceless Mexican immigrants was an open question.

Wilson, an otherwise bland moderate, calculated that the numbers were on his side if voters were pitted against disenfranchised immigrants. He ignored the outrage over the initiative from religious and civic leaders, and the overwhelming verdict of newspaper editorial writers.

Brown courageously staked her campaign on opposing Proposition 187. Yet if there was any hope of turning the tide, it disappeared when thousands of angry Latino students took to the streets in protest. They were carrying hundreds of Mexican flags (and a scattering of American ones). The Mexican tricolors were branded by proponents of 187 as indelible proof that these youths constituted a foreign invasion.

Of course, I believe most of those flags had been acquired months before by soccer fans, not die-hard Mexican nationalists. Voters reacted viscerally to a misinterpreted symbol. Their emotions were manipulated by the political agenda of supposed patriots. Wilson and his far-right allies waved the American flag while they turned their back on the Statue of Liberty. Nowadays, immigration reform rallies are flooded with U.S. flags, carried by those seeking overdue equal justice.

California is a different state today. You can wear a colorful soccer jersey, wave a flag and cheer for Brazil, Italy or Mexico without censure — unless they are playing the American squad. The world has come back to the land of the Rose Bowl, and this time it's genuinely welcome.

Rick Cole, deputy mayor for budget and innovation for the city of Los Angeles, was mayor of Pasadena in 1994.

Copyright © 2014, Los Angeles Times
Related Content
CommentaryOpinionPoliticsSoccerElectionsMigrationIllegal Immigrants
  • U.S. is in the position it hoped for at World Cup
    U.S. is in the position it hoped for at World Cup

    When the U.S. team landed in Brazil two weeks ago, its path to the second round of the World Cup was a simple one: beat Ghana, play Portugal to a tie and hope the tiebreakers work in its favor.

  • Metro shouldn't play the name game
    Metro shouldn't play the name game

    How should Los Angeles say “thanks” to long-serving politicians who have done the people's business through good times and bad? When a fruit basket just isn't enough, the honorarium of choice for L.A. County supervisors and other local elected officials has been to have...

  • FCC has no business regulating the name of a football team
    FCC has no business regulating the name of a football team

    The Federal Communications Commission has been petitioned by an activist lawyer to effectively regulate the word “redskins” off the air. While this page has argued that the Washington Redskins football team should adopt a new name — the current one is racist — it...

  • Clear, thoughtful rules are needed for recordings by LAPD
    Clear, thoughtful rules are needed for recordings by LAPD

    The Los Angeles police sergeant who caused a controversy when he detained “Django Unchained” actress Daniele Watts in response to a 911 call last month has now publicly defended his decision to turn over an audio recording he made of the incident to the celebrity news site TMZ,...

  • Why the rule of law requires the bite of punishment
    Why the rule of law requires the bite of punishment

    Like all humans, judges are susceptible to fads. Anger management became a popular feature of American probationary sentences in the 1980s. A few years ago it was teen courts, then drug courts. The new fad is something called “evidence-based sentencing,” and it is both a...

  • Is feminism's current moment all slogan and no change?
    Is feminism's current moment all slogan and no change?

    Like the cicada, which lies dormant for 13 or 17 years and then suddenly makes a cacophonous comeback, feminism is having a moment. It's announcing itself on magazine covers, dominating discussions on culture blogs and, in one case, making itself known in huge, lighted letters spelling...

  • Can Spain and Catalonia's marriage be saved? Let the Catalans vote
    Can Spain and Catalonia's marriage be saved? Let the Catalans vote

    Catalonia's drive to break away from Spain hit a roadblock this week. Spain's Constitutional Court on Monday agreed to hear Spanish Prime Minister Mariano Rajoy's appeal contesting Catalonia's plan for a Nov. 9 referendum on independence and suspended the regional vote....

  • For NFL to change, it's up to us to confront the sport's moral hazards
    For NFL to change, it's up to us to confront the sport's moral hazards

    In August I pledged in these pages to stop following football because of my misgivings about the game’s corruptions. Almost immediately, those corruptions exploded into public view as never before. Disturbing images and descriptions of off-the-field violence committed by star players,...

Comments
Loading