OpinionOp-Ed

Free the Keystone XL pipeline, Mr. President

Upstream Oil and Gas ActivitiesLaws and LegislationEnvironmental IssuesCrime, Law and JusticeU.S. Department of StateGlobal WarmingKeystone XL Pipeline

Welcome to the "year of action." In last week's State of the Union address, the president vowed to do whatever he has to to help the economy, even if that means working around Congress: "What I offer tonight is a set of concrete, practical proposals to speed up growth, strengthen the middle class and build new ladders of opportunity into the middle class. Some require congressional action, and I'm eager to work with all of you. But America does not stand still, and neither will I. So wherever and whenever I can take steps without legislation to expand opportunity for more American families, that's what I'm going to do."

The White House has touted the fact the president has a "phone and a pen" and he's not afraid to use them.

The president also vowed to cut red tape, and not for the first time. In 2013's State of the Union, he insisted that "my administration will keep cutting red tape and speeding up new oil and gas permits." And in 2012: "In the next few weeks, I will sign an executive order clearing away the red tape that slows down too many construction projects."

All of this was in the wake of Obama's 2011 executive order requiring the elimination of "redundant, inconsistent or overlapping" regulations. The administration had hailed the order as an "unprecedented" move to boost growth. In an op-ed for the Wall Street Journal touting the order, the president wrote: "We're also getting rid of absurd and unnecessary paperwork requirements that waste time and money."

Laymen might have the impression the president wants to cut red tape and take action on job-creating infrastructure, particularly oil and gas projects.

The fools.

On Friday, the State Department issued a much-awaited study on the Keystone XL pipeline. It found that there would be negligible effect on climate change — the president's only expressed reservation about the project, which would create thousands of construction jobs and generate billions in tax revenue.

In fact, the study concluded that if the pipeline from Canada is not built, it could result in a significant increase in greenhouse gas emissions. That's because the alternative means (trucks, rail, etc.) of transporting the fuel — which Canada says will be pumped no matter what — are more carbon intensive than a pipeline.

So we're a go, right? Au contraire, White House Chief of Staff Denis McDonough explained Sunday on NBC's "Meet the Press." The State Department study is but "one of many important inputs into the process." Other departments get to weigh in. Which ones? Well, almost all of them, it seems: Defense, Justice, Interior, Commerce, Transportation, Energy and Homeland Security, plus the Environmental Protection Agency. Those poor saps at Housing and Urban Development must feel like chopped liver.

But it gets funnier. "What the president's role is now is to protect this process from politics," McDonough said, "let the experts, the expert agencies and the Cabinet secretaries make their assessments both of the study … as well as its impact on the national interest."

It all sounds so reasonable. The only problem is that the Keystone XL pipeline has been under constant study since the U.S. extension was proposed in 2008. Friday's State Department report — weighing in at 11 volumes! — was initiated for political purposes. In 2011, after extensive study, State called the pipeline the "preferred alternative."

The hitch is that environmental groups stupidly made the pipeline a litmus test issue for climate seriousness. And so Obama's EPA ordered a do-over that conveniently punted the decision until after the presidential election.

According to the Pew Research Center, the overwhelming top concern of Americans has been "strengthening the economy" (80% of respondents in 2014) and "improving the job situation" (74% in 2014). Dealing with global warming has ranked either last or second to last (29% in 2014).

But by all means, let's hear more talk about this being the year of action with heroic penmanship and red tape cutting. Because it appears talk is all we ever get.

jgoldberg@latimescolumnists.com

Copyright © 2014, Los Angeles Times
Related Content
Upstream Oil and Gas ActivitiesLaws and LegislationEnvironmental IssuesCrime, Law and JusticeU.S. Department of StateGlobal WarmingKeystone XL Pipeline
  • State of the Union: A call for collaboration by the president
    State of the Union: A call for collaboration by the president

    Obama made a number of conciliatory gestures toward Republicans, but he was also resolute where he had to be.

  • State of the Union: Obama's era of limits
    State of the Union: Obama's era of limits

    What happened to the visionary politician? Simple: Reality has sunk in.

  • New Afghan government; same old problems
    New Afghan government; same old problems

    President Obama called Kabul on Sunday to congratulate Afghan presidential contenders Ashraf Ghani and Abdullah Abdullah for finally accepting a power-sharing deal to resolve a months-long dispute over who won in an election deeply marred by fraud. "Signing this political...

  • What 'war on women'?
    What 'war on women'?

    On Friday, the White House announced its “It's On Us” initiative aimed at combating sexual assaults on college campuses. I'm all in favor of combating sexual assault, but the first priority in combating a problem is understanding it.

  • Ashley Swearengin for state controller
    Ashley Swearengin for state controller

    Californians have been breathing a bit easier in recent months as the state government's finances have turned — slowly, like an ocean freighter — from disaster to solvency. But the work is hardly done, and diligence is called for to ensure the budget doesn't drift off...

  • Let's make a climate deal, California
    Let's make a climate deal, California

    It has been almost 25 years since the United States joined much of the world in Rio de Janeiro and tentatively agreed to do something to reduce the pollutants associated with global warming and other climate disruption. Since then, though, the U.S. has been a laggard in taking major action....

Comments
Loading