Reading Los Angeles: Join The Times' new book club
Opinion Opinion L.A.

It's Anthem Blue Cross' turn to turn on Obamacare

Let's get this out of the way right up front: I feel like a guy who's continually making excuses for a friend who repeatedly messes up.

For supporters (such as myself) of the 2010 Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, better known as Obamacare, Friday presented another occasion to make excuses. This time it was the stunning news that Anthem Blue Cross will not offer group plans to small employers through a new, subsidized marketplace being set up by Covered California -- at least not in the exchange's first year.

Unlike the two insurers who'd previously said they were staying out of Covered California's new exchange for individual buyers, Anthem is a major player in the market for small group coverage. According to my colleague Chad Terhune, Anthem was the leading provider of coverage to small businesses in 2011, writing nearly one-third of the policies.

Nevertheless, the development looks worse than it really is. As far as workers are concerned, Anthem's decision not to offer policies through the exchange shouldn't make a difference. It won't help Covered California's marketplace for small businesses, which won't benefit from as much competition. But small businesses can still shop for policies directly or through a preexisting exchange, called CaliforniaChoice, that lets them offer their workers multiple options for coverage.

Covered California offers something unique to businesses with up to 25 low- and moderate-income employees: tax credits that offset part of the cost of offering insurance for two years. The amount of the credit depends on the size of the company and the average wages paid. Although that tax credit was available as early as 2010, starting in January it can be claimed only by businesses that purchase coverage through the exchange. So far, though, relatively few businesses have sought the credit, either because the provisions are confusing or because health insurance is too costly for qualified employers to provide even with the tax break.

Micah Weinberg, a senior policy advisor for the Bay Area Council, said Anthem's decision not to participate was "a big issue" for Covered California's small-business exchange. "Other than the tax credits, there's nothing really that [Covered California] offers that they can't get elsewhere. And now it has fewer choices of plans," Weinberg said.

From Anthem's perspective, Covered California may simply have been a more costly way to sell policies than to continue marketing them directly to businesses. And with apparently little interest in the tax credits, Anthem may have concluded that the number of potential customers at the exchange was too low to be worth the cost.

For small businesses, not having Anthem in the exchange means less choice of plans, but just in that one venue. Granted, Covered California will be the only place to obtain the tax credits, so the result may be fewer small businesses deciding to start offering coverage. That won't be a step backward, though, just not a step forward.

Ultimately, what matters is how many Americans have insurance, not how many employers provide it. And oddly enough, the subsidies provided in the law could make coverage less expensive for lower-income workers shopping as individuals than as members of a small group plan. That's because the tax credits for individuals earning less than three times the federal poverty line can leave them with smaller premiums than their employers can require them to pay.

In other words, if Anthem's stance results in fewer employers offering coverage, that may actually make it easier for low-wage workers to obtain coverage. That perverse result is another illustration of a point I've made before, which is that lawmakers should have severed the country's dependence on employer-provided coverage instead of leveraging it in their bid to achieve universal health insurance.

Again, I'm not arguing that Anthem's move is welcome or beneficial. I'm just saying, as with so many of the setbacks faced by Obamacare this year, that it's not as bad as it looks. At least not to those of us making excuses.


Immigration reform: It's alive!

Who's to blame for Detroit's collapse?

Rolling Stone nails it with its Dzhokhar Tsarnaev cover

Follow Jon Healey on Twitter @jcahealey

Copyright © 2015, Los Angeles Times
Related Content
  • Health shouldn't be based on where you live
    Health shouldn't be based on where you live

    Strand by strand, my younger sister has been pulling the threads of her life back together after a couple of lost decades. A year ago at age 52, and with the financial support of our extended family, she found housing in Virginia, where we were both born and raised, and she has since gotten a part-time...

  • House GOP lawsuit wages surprising fight over federal purse strings
    House GOP lawsuit wages surprising fight over federal purse strings

    When the House GOP authorized a lawsuit accusing President Obama of overstepping his authority, the rationale it offered was a head-scratcher: the administration's move to delay the employer mandate, a requirement that House Republicans unanimously opposed.

  • Who should and shouldn't get heart transplants -- and why?
    Who should and shouldn't get heart transplants -- and why?

    When a Georgia teenager named Anthony Stokes got himself killed not long ago, smashing up a stolen car in a police chase after supposedly taking a shot at an old lady in her house, the regret that poured out online was not for the death of the 17-year-old, but for the “waste” of the transplanted...

  • Children's Health Insurance Program deserves funding
    Children's Health Insurance Program deserves funding

    In what may be a hopelessly quixotic effort, supporters of the federal Children's Health Insurance Program are trying to persuade Congress to renew its funding almost a year in advance — and in a lame-duck session. Nevertheless, lawmakers ought to heed that call. The program plugs a troubling gap...

  • The GOP's shameful lawsuit against Obamacare
    The GOP's shameful lawsuit against Obamacare

    The lawsuit the House GOP filed against President Obama on Friday opened a new front in the attack on the 2010 healthcare law, this time targeting the subsidies that reduce deductibles, co-pays and other out-of-pocket expenses faced by lower-income Americans. According to the complaint, the subsidies...

  • A sensible cap on costly prescription drugs
    A sensible cap on costly prescription drugs

    To help prevent Americans from being bankrupted by medical bills, the 2010 federal healthcare law placed an annual cap on deductibles, co-pays and other out-of-pocket costs imposed by health insurers. That's turned out to be a mixed blessing for Americans who suffer from certain chronic diseases,...

  • Stop the guessing game over which doctors are in-network
    Stop the guessing game over which doctors are in-network

    One of the loudest complaints about the policies sold through Covered California, the state's new health insurance exchange, is that they provide access to far fewer doctors than promised. On Wednesday, state regulators finally confirmed and quantified the problem with respect to two leading insurers,...

  • Jonathan Gruber should've been Time's Person of the Year
    Jonathan Gruber should've been Time's Person of the Year

    Jonathan Gruber should have been Time's Person of the Year. The magazine gave it to the "Ebola Fighters" instead. Good for them; they're doing God's work. Still, Gruber would have been better.