Voting Nov. 4? See The Times' endorsements before heading to the polls.
OpinionReaders React
Readers React

DNA evidence and the O.J. Simpson trial

Justice SystemTrials and ArbitrationO.J. Simpson

I enjoyed reading Patt Morrison's interview with lawyer Barry Scheck. For years I have wondered if I had been unfair to Scheck in considering him a hypocrite for devaluing DNA evidence in the O.J. Simpson trial while using it as a mainstay in his worthy goal of exonerating innocent victims of wrongful convictions. ("Barry Scheck on the O.J. trial, DNA evidence and the Innocence Project," Op-Ed, June 17)

Scheck tells us that the Simpson defense team did not challenge the reliability of DNA testing, only the manner in which it was collected and analyzed. I believe he is being disingenuous. Scheck misled the unsophisticated jurors to the untrue idea that DNA degraded by poor collection and preservation measures could somehow turn the "real killer's" DNA into Simpson's.

It would have been fascinating to read Scheck's answer if he had been asked for his opinion as to whether his contribution to Simpson's acquittal was consonant with the truth.

Cyril Barnert

Los Angeles

Copyright © 2014, Los Angeles Times
Related Content
Justice SystemTrials and ArbitrationO.J. Simpson
  • Hanging a noose is terrorism, not a prank

    To the editor: I read this article on "pranks" involving nooses with deep concern for our country and its people. The hangman's noose and what it represents is a dreadful part of our history. ("The ominous symbolism of the noose," Op-Ed, Oct. 27)

  • Sending off Times veteran Bob Pool

    To the editor: The tribute by Steve Lopez for Bob Pool upon his retirement after 31 years at The Times is well-deserved. ("Reporter Bob Pool, retiring after 50 years, covered the quirks of a metropolis," Oct. 29)

  • Will soaking the rick close the wealth gap?

    To the editor: Michael Hiltzik wrings his hands over a perceived problem without a solution besides certain tax increases. Believe me, increasing the minimum wage is not going to do it. ("U.S. income inequality is bad, but wealth inequality is a bigger problem," Oct. 24)

  • Tuition inflation: a 21st Century crisis
    Tuition inflation: a 21st Century crisis

    To the editor: The escalating cost of education is the crisis of the 21st century. While Germany has tuition-free universities, our government is digging a bigger hole for current and future generations to climb out of while reaping profits from student loans, which in turn fuels the tuition...

  • Will soda taxes wean the poor off sugary drinks?

    To the editor: Christopher D. Cook would have made a more cogent argument if he questioned why low-income people buy and drink sugary drinks. If you have little money, it is in your best interest to eat what will give you long-term energy and truly quench your thirst, and sugary drinks do...

  • Rand Paul's political ordinariness

    To the editor: Doyle McManus pretty much sums up what kind of presidential candidate Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) would be — just another politician. ("The new Rand Paul vs. the old Rand Paul," Op-Ed, Oct. 24)