OpinionReaders React
Readers React

Students and teachers benefit from tenure

EducatorsSchools

To the editor: Ronald Brownstein is correct that the societal problems that perpetuate social inequality go beyond the Vergara "fix" on teacher job protections. Nevertheless, he fails to address important questions about school reform.

Absent the strictures of tenure, for example, will administrators who have made bad staffing decisions hire the best teachers rather than the cheapest and most compliant ones? Does youthful enthusiasm really equate with better teaching outcomes, or is it simply the ageist meme of the moment? Is the agenda of the educational reformer-capitalists truly altruistic?

James Madison wrote, "If men were angels, no government would be necessary." The truth is that educational reformers, administrators and teachers are not angels. Our schools need rules to ensure that innovation, honest dialogue and a fair workplace are protected.

What is good for kids need not be different from what is good for teachers and their families.

Lorraine Gayer, Huntington Beach

The writer is a former history teacher.

..

To the editor: Brownstein's piece enraged me. I almost stopped at the sixth paragraph.

As a teacher-librarian, I'm interested in the Vergara ruling, so I read all that I can about it, including Brownstein's column. I was fine until he wrote that "better-performing younger teachers were regularly sacrificed to protect less-effective elders."

What are Brownstein's criteria for good performance? Having worked in the field of education as well as the private sector for a number of years, I've discovered that age has little to do with performance.

There are young teachers who are not cut out for the rigors of teaching, while seasoned professionals are still performing at the top of their game. Age is not, and should not, be the deciding factor.

Sheryl Grabow-Weiss, Chatsworth

Copyright © 2014, Los Angeles Times
Related Content
EducatorsSchools
  • Giving more money to the government isn't moral

    To the editor: Michael Hiltzik's characterization of professor Edward Kleinbard's book as a "clear moral approach" to taxation is amusing and disingenuous. ("On fiscal policy, USC professor's viewpoint is moral and farsighted," Oct. 18)

  • Kevin de León's grand gesture to L.A.'s youth

    To the editor: I'm disappointed that much of the coverage of Senate President Pro Tem Kevin de León's (D-Los Angeles) swearing-in ceremony focused on the location and cost. ("De León throws extravagant bash as Steinberg quietly leaves," Oct. 19)

  • Signs of change on LGBT issues in the Catholic Church

    To the editor: Lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender Catholics are deeply disappointed that the final summary of the synod on the family at the Vatican omitted the welcoming and respectful language that received such widespread media attention when the interim report was issued last week....

  • How much will the 710 tunnel really cost?

    To the editor: I find the $5.4-billion cost to finish the 710 Freeway by boring a tunnel between Alhambra and Pasadena — underneath those communities in addition to South Pasadena — to be a gross underestimate. ("Officials consider extending 710 Freeway with tunnels," Oct....

  • Immigration inaction shouldn't keep Latinos from voting
    Immigration inaction shouldn't keep Latinos from voting

    To the editor: It took African Americans hundreds of years to gain their freedom. Still, to this day, young blacks are gunned down for walking down the street, playing music too loud or simply for asking for assistance. Legislation does not end the struggle. ("Latinos, angry with Obama,...

  • How unfair was Whittier's at-large voting system?

    To the editor: The editorial states that until recently, Whittier voters elected at-large City Council members rather than ones representing individual districts, and that this arrangement resulted in the Latino population being underrepresented. ("Whittier's voting system shift is...

Comments
Loading