Opinion
Join The Times' book club. This month's selection: "Cadillac Desert"
Opinion Readers React
Readers React

The new LACMA: Does an art museum have to be a work of art?

To the editor: The primary function of a museum is to display art and to serve as a community amenity. It appears that the current primary goal of upgrading the L.A. County Museum of Art is to create a "work of art." This is putting the cart in front of the horse. ("LACMA redesign avoids tar pits, creates challenges," June 24)

In 1959, an architecture professor I had as a freshman told us that first, a building must be functional, and that if it has utility, it will be beautiful. Utility encompasses all the things that society requires in contemporary buildings: sound structural and seismic design; safety for fire and exiting; disabled access; sustainability and minimal environmental impact; serviceability of power, data, lighting, mechanical, elevator and escalator systems; and interface with the street and Metro.

To glom onto any particular architectural design at this point is premature. It would be prudent to provide only preliminary approval with further study and design development before issuing a final go-ahead. It will be costly to develop the design, but at least it will be easier to establish a realistic construction budget for the project.

Personally, I don't understand the significance of the amoeba-like footprint of the new LACMA. On the other hand, I like the idea of bridging Wilshire Boulevard, as it will better define a sense of place. It would be good to see more use of airspace in L.A

Jared Sloan, Silver Lake

..

To the editor: Every 10 years LACMA has a redesign spasm. What was once Rem Koolhaas' is now Peter Zumthor's mixy-swirly mess, round two.

The Times' worshipful commentary glides over cost, storage and other lurking considerations. How about skinning the exteriors of the current William Pereira structures with an interesting LED pixel grid for $20 million, out the door?

Bottom line: The public swarms LACMA and couldn't care less about the sniffy distaste for the 1965 mid-century originals. Save the county a pile of money, do the L.A. face-lift thing, and in 20 years people will realize they saved another architectural nugget.

Larry Gassan, Los Angeles

Copyright © 2015, Los Angeles Times
Related Content
  • Closing the military-civilian divide: Bring back the draft

    To the editor: The incisive and informative article highlights the degree to which 99.5% of all Americans have no involvement with our military. ("U.S. military and civilians are increasingly divided," May 24)

  • Why being a 'real man' doesn't require carrying a gun

    To the editor: Jennifer Carlson says the increasing prevalence of men carrying guns in public in some areas is the result of a "crisis of confidence in the American dream." She writes that "men find in guns a sense of duty, relevance and even dignity." ("Why men feel the need to carry guns," op-ed,...

  • Don't write off the Democrats in 2016

    To the editor: There's an inherent flaw in basing one's prediction of a future election outcome on a few historical coincidences. And that is history doesn't necessarily repeat itself. ("In 2016's presidential race, the winner will be ...," op-ed, May 26)

  • FIFA indictments: What about the deaths in Qatar?

    FIFA indictments: What about the deaths in Qatar?

    To the editor: The corruption inquiry into soccer-governing body FIFA is long overdue, but the probe and your coverage fail to mention the most crucial aspect of the corruption: the deaths of 1,200 guest construction workers in Qatar who are slaving to build the stadiums for the 2022 World Cup,...

  • Recycled wastewater: Get over the 'yuck factor'

    To the editor: I'm a bit amused by the arguments against recycling sewage for reuse as potable water. ("Turning sewage into drinking water gains appeal as drought lingers," May 24)

  • Why can't Bernie Sanders win?

    To the editor: I beg to differ with Doyle McManus' assessment of Sen. Bernie Sanders' chances of winning. ("Bernie Sanders: Why the guy who won't win matters," op-ed, May 27)

Comments
Loading