OpinionReaders React
Readers React

Putin's provacations mean Obama has a 'Russia problem'

RussiaInternational Laws and TreatiesPoliticsVladimir Putin

To the editor: Steven Pifer is correct to argue for "continued U.S. observance" of the 1987 Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty in response to its finding that "Russia violated [that treaty] by testing a prohibited cruise missile." Also, he is right that the United States should "press Russian officials, through the Special Verification Commission" established by the INF Treaty. These are necessary, but insufficient. ("What should Obama do about Russia and the INF Treaty? Channel Reagan.," Op-Ed, July 30)

If Russia did violate the treaty, this is not only a technical arms-control issue, and it needs to be seen in the overall pattern of Kremlin behavior. President Vladimir Putin has surely gone very far with this violation and in his overall military activities: in Crimea, in Ukraine, in repeated exercises of forces in his Western Military District. On the one hand, these activities show the depth of his alienation in his relations with the West. On the other, they show his willingness to use military means to destabilize the post-Cold War European order.

The Obama administration needs a strategy for dealing with an aggrieved and potentially dangerous Kremlin. It is not enough to apply a sanction here and to make a demarche there. We now face a major "Russia problem."

Larry T. Caldwell, Beaumont

The writer, a professor emeritus of politics at Occidental College, has taught courses on U.S. national security and Russian foreign policy.

Copyright © 2014, Los Angeles Times
Related Content
RussiaInternational Laws and TreatiesPoliticsVladimir Putin
  • America's state of permanent war

    To the editor: I always read Andrew J. Bacevich's columns with the expectation that his insights and intellectual courage will be vividly on display. I have no argument with his "whack-a-mole" metaphor concerning the Middle East or his doubts about the efficacy of President...

  • Rationalizing Israeli injustice against Palestinians

    To the editor: Yossi Klein Halevi acknowledges that "Israel's long-term survival depends on ending the occupation" and that "the Jews didn't come home to deny another people its sense of home." ("How do Israelis cope?," Op-Ed, Sept. 12)

  • Daniele Watts got what she deserved from police

    To the editor: The police have such an incredibly hard job. Every day, they put their lives on the line, something that most of us aren't willing to do. ("LAPD investigates officers' conduct in detention of actress," Sept. 14)

  • Chiropractors who sell 'cures' for diabetes

    To the editor: I think David Lazarus shows some intestinal fortitude in writing this column, given that his employer (The Times) is deriving advertising revenue from one of the very advertisements Lazarus cites. ("A cure for diabetes? Don't look to chiropractors, state says,"...

  • What do Rod Wright's constituents think?

    To the editor: I served with state Sen. Roderick D. Wright (D-Inglewood) for three years in the Legislature and found him to be the kind of thoughtful, bipartisan gentleman that Sacramento sorely needs. He served the Legislature with distinction, treated his colleagues with respect and...

  • Scotland's referendum: It's secession, not independence
    Scotland's referendum: It's secession, not independence

    To the editor: The referendum in Scotland should be regarded as concerning secession, not independence. Scotland is an integral part of the political union known as the United Kingdom, which has about 64 million members. Among other questionable aspects of this referendum, expatriate Scots...

Comments
Loading