Opinion
Get Opinion in your inbox -- sign up for our weekly newsletter
Opinion Readers React
Readers React

Don't bet on the bullet train's estimated cost

To the editor: The Times reports that the first 29-mile segment of the bullet train through the Central Valley has 13% of the required parcels. This is likely to be the easiest portion of the route regarding land acquisition. ("Lack of land slows work on California bullet train project," Aug. 13)

The estimated cost remains at $68 billion. In comparison, the recently completed Oakland Bay Bridge project was more than $5 billion over budget and took 10 years longer than expected. The cost was supposed to be $1.3 billion.

Granted, there were some unexpected complications, but that's not unusual. Given any uncertainties that may arise, the idea that building the bullet train — a project orders of magnitude more complicated than the Bay Bridge work — will cost $68 billion is just fantasy.

I would be willing to bet the final cost will be double that. But given the current rate of progress, I doubt I will live long enough to collect on such a wager.

A.J. Briggs, Huntington Beach

Copyright © 2015, Los Angeles Times
Related Content
  • Lack of land slows work on California bullet train project

    Lack of land slows work on California bullet train project

    The Hollywood Inn, a shuttered nightclub in a run-down section of Fresno, has been demolished. A few miles away, an 80-foot-deep shaft to test soil conditions has been sunk into the banks of the Fresno River.

  • Marriage equality: a right is a right

    Marriage equality: a right is a right

    To the editor: Descriptions such as “restraint” or “intervention” seem inappropriate when describing our current Supreme Court justices. I prefer the terms “unreasonable” or “reasonable.” (“Same-sex marriage ruling highlights Supreme Court quandary: Restraint or intervention?,” June 29)Unreasonable...

  • Obamacare decision: Lawyers doing what lawyers do

    Obamacare decision: Lawyers doing what lawyers do

    To the editor: I was startled to read the opinion piece by David B. Rivkin Jr. and Elizabeth Price Foley on King vs. Burwell. (“A terrible precedent,” Opinion, June 29) Clearly there are some good arguments pro and con, and a literalist interpretation of what appears to have been a typographical...

  • Don't blame the electric cars

    To the editor: Dear Gov. Jerry Brown: My family is doing what we can to save the environment. (“Rough road,” July 1) 

  • Religion at work

    Religion at work

    To the editor: Would the Texas attorney general condone county clerks of one religion refusing to issue building permits to construct houses of worship for another religion? (“Vows against gay marriage,” June 30) Could a religiously pacifist clerk in Texas refuse to issue concealed-carry handgun...

  • A helping hand for the homeless

    A helping hand for the homeless

    To the editor: I read with amazement the article detailing the decision of the Los Angeles City Council. (“Stop punishing the homeless,” Opinion, June 30)

  • Why can't we watch the police?

    To the editor: Unlike many countries in which officers are unarmed while performing routine duties on the streets, we have armed our police and given them the authority to kill members of our community as needed. (“Big test for police video in Gardena,” June 30)

  • Black vs. gay?

    To the editor: Meeke Addison's statement that “your sexual preference is not equal to the color of my skin, an immutable characteristic” (“Wedded to traditional ideas,” June 30) very accurately states a fundamental misunderstanding pervasive in the anti-same-sex marriage dialogue.

Comments
Loading