Opinion
Join The Times' book club. This month's selection: "Cadillac Desert"
Opinion Readers React
Readers React

A UC system for Californians first

To the editor: Ah, for the good-old days, when Californians understood the value of education for everyone. My husband and I, our son, our sisters, nieces and nephews all attended University of California schools in those glory days when Californians "got it." ("A record number of out-of-state students brings windfall for UC system," Aug. 17)

Am I really expected to believe that, with about 30% of UC admissions at the three most competitive schools being non-residents, "no California residents are being pushed out"?

The $400 million gained from having these higher-paying students in UC is a drop in the bucket for California. How much extra would each taxpayer in the state have to pay to make up this amount?

One out-of-state student is quoted as saying that his higher tuition is justified because residents have paid their taxes for years to support these schools. He is bloody well right, and we ought to realize who benefits from educating our youth.

Barbara Rosen, Fullerton

..

To the editor: As a mother of a high school junior, it has become increasingly frustrating to read articles on UC boosting nonresident enrollment. What began as a necessary measure in difficult economic times seems to be setting a scary precedent.

When UC officials insist that California residents aren't losing enrollment spots, are they talking specifically about the most competitive schools like UCLA and UC Berkeley? Are they redirecting applicants who don't make it into their top choices to lower-tier schools in the UC system?

While I understand the need for universities to adapt to changing times, it is unfair to ask California families — who, according to a young student from Greensboro, N.C., have paid "their hard-earned money" in taxes to support UC — to continue to trust the system to judge its applicants without a hidden agenda.

Lorraine Lopes, Simi Valley

..

To the editor: While I can understand an incoming freshman believing that "California is a place where you can dream as big as you want to" by attending UCLA, what I cannot understand are the parents who are willing to lay out an additional $92,000 over four years of out-of-state fees so that their daughter can attend.

What is wrong with Indiana University, where she states she was admitted? Its main campus at Bloomington, like UC Berkeley, is considered on par with the Ivy League.

The daughter's quote "It definitely would have been less expensive to go to I.U., but I don't think I would have been as happy" is a clear demonstration of the problem with far too many of our youth today. Our society endorses any cost to make our kids happy, happier, happiest.

Many fine graduates have come from I.U. I don't think Mark Cuban is complaining about his education there.

Cindy J. Schreiber, Thousand Oaks

Copyright © 2015, Los Angeles Times
Related Content
  • Punishing banks but not bankers isn't working

    To the editor: Holding businesses and government accountable for the wrongdoing of individual workers is not working. When a banker commits fraud and the shareholders pay the penalty, there is no deterrent. When police assault a citizen and taxpayers cover the penalty, there is no deterrent. ("5...

  • City Hall could learn from David Ryu's hands-on campaigning

    To the editor: David Ryu, newly elected to the Los Angeles City Council, has been given the opportunity to bring a breath of fresh air to the insider stench-filled City Hall. ("Can David Ryu maintain his outsider stance inside City Hall?," editorial, May 21)

  • L.A. police could have used more military gear in 1997

    To the editor: Let's step back and take a logical look at the military equipment and how it can be used by police. ("Demilitarizing America's police," editorial, May 19)

  • How long should a pop song be?

    To the editor: Casey Rae is right on the money in lamenting the new trend to shorten country music songs by excising instrumental breaks. What Rae doesn't consider is whether country music has been reduced to so much formulaic pap. ("Guitar solos are getting the ax in country music songs," op-ed,...

  • Go back, and give up all this technology? Never.

    To the editor: Doyle McManus cites the familiar research that for the last 40 years, people in this country have tended to believe that things are getting worse, not better, and that the future promises less to our kids than it offered us. ("Is the American dream really dying?," op-ed, May 20)

  • How much good will urban water cuts do?

    How much good will urban water cuts do?

    To the editor: I agree with Nathanael Johnson that it's time to stop approaching the conversation about water use as one about "farms versus cities," but for reasons different than his. Finger-pointing simply misses the point. ("In the water crisis, it's time to move beyond the farms vs. cities...

Comments
Loading