Grading City Hall: How is L.A.'s city controller doing so far?
Readers React
Opinion Readers React
Readers React

A UC system for Californians first

To the editor: Ah, for the good-old days, when Californians understood the value of education for everyone. My husband and I, our son, our sisters, nieces and nephews all attended University of California schools in those glory days when Californians "got it." ("A record number of out-of-state students brings windfall for UC system," Aug. 17)

Am I really expected to believe that, with about 30% of UC admissions at the three most competitive schools being non-residents, "no California residents are being pushed out"?

The $400 million gained from having these higher-paying students in UC is a drop in the bucket for California. How much extra would each taxpayer in the state have to pay to make up this amount?

One out-of-state student is quoted as saying that his higher tuition is justified because residents have paid their taxes for years to support these schools. He is bloody well right, and we ought to realize who benefits from educating our youth.

Barbara Rosen, Fullerton


To the editor: As a mother of a high school junior, it has become increasingly frustrating to read articles on UC boosting nonresident enrollment. What began as a necessary measure in difficult economic times seems to be setting a scary precedent.

When UC officials insist that California residents aren't losing enrollment spots, are they talking specifically about the most competitive schools like UCLA and UC Berkeley? Are they redirecting applicants who don't make it into their top choices to lower-tier schools in the UC system?

While I understand the need for universities to adapt to changing times, it is unfair to ask California families — who, according to a young student from Greensboro, N.C., have paid "their hard-earned money" in taxes to support UC — to continue to trust the system to judge its applicants without a hidden agenda.

Lorraine Lopes, Simi Valley


To the editor: While I can understand an incoming freshman believing that "California is a place where you can dream as big as you want to" by attending UCLA, what I cannot understand are the parents who are willing to lay out an additional $92,000 over four years of out-of-state fees so that their daughter can attend.

What is wrong with Indiana University, where she states she was admitted? Its main campus at Bloomington, like UC Berkeley, is considered on par with the Ivy League.

The daughter's quote "It definitely would have been less expensive to go to I.U., but I don't think I would have been as happy" is a clear demonstration of the problem with far too many of our youth today. Our society endorses any cost to make our kids happy, happier, happiest.

Many fine graduates have come from I.U. I don't think Mark Cuban is complaining about his education there.

Cindy J. Schreiber, Thousand Oaks

Copyright © 2015, Los Angeles Times
Related Content
  • Utilities need to do their part to help renters save water

    To the editor: Sub-metering apartments for water places the burden of billing on owners, making each one his own mini-utility. We hate that. Why not require utilities to do their job and install individual meters for apartments? But that costs “thousands of dollars per unit,” claims the article....

  • In defense of unaccredited law schools

    To the editor: As a successful graduate of an unaccredited law school, I take exception to your article on the schools' high dropout rates. Not everyone is cut out to become an attorney, just like not everyone is cut out to be a journalist or a doctor. The failures of many do not make the system...

  • 'Dear Cal' letters allow Berkeley to make better admission decisions

    To the editor: For decades the University of California system, Ivy League schools and other academic assemblages have been pondering the question, “GPA, SAT, ACT — is that all there is?” ("Can a Dear Cal letter get you into Berkeley?," op-ed, July 26)

  • Anthem-Cigna merger and single-payer health insurance

    To the editor: So we're on the way to a single-payer healthcare system after all. The only problem is that the single payer will not be an efficient, consumer-oriented entity like Medicare but will instead be a profit-driven, consumer-be-damned business like Anthem Inc., which plans to buy rival...

  • In Alhambra, cultural diversity brings food diversity

    To the editor: I suppose journalism allows a color story on the front pages these days, but, really, disgruntled Alhambra residents bemoaning a Ralphs supermarket leaving and a 99 Ranch arriving? ("In Alhambra, demographic shift reaches the grocery store," July 27)

  • Lafayette, Chattanooga and Charleston shootings: It's the guns, stupid

    Lafayette, Chattanooga and Charleston shootings: It's the guns, stupid

    To the editor: Another day, another mass shooting in America — the latest in a theater in Lafayette, La. Cue the predictable debate about movie theater security, metal detectors and armed guards. ("Lafayette shooting renews debate on movie theater security," July 25)