Get Opinion in your inbox -- sign up for our weekly newsletter
Opinion Readers React
Readers React

John Bolton's bad advice for Obama on Ukraine

To the editor: I scanned former U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations John Bolton's Op-Ed piece for any mention of how his onetime boss handled a similar crisis: Russia's partial annexation of Georgia in 2008. ("U.S. still has time to stake out a position of strength on Ukraine," Op-Ed, Aug. 19)

Bolton cited only George W. Bush's 2008 "plan" to incorporate Ukraine into the North Atlantic Treaty Organization. There was nothing about the Bush administration's measured response on Georgia, which was basically to do nothing.

Nor did he touch on Russian President Vladimir Putin's obvious motive in annexing Crimea: to preserve Russia's access to its only warm-water naval base, more than 700 miles from its capital. (Imagine America's response if our only Atlantic naval base were enclosed in an unfriendly nation that close to our shores.)

Bolton argues for more "strength," meaning threats of war.

Once again, one of the architects of the disastrous Bush-Cheney foreign policy is lecturing President Obama, who has spent five years undoing his predecessor's blunders. It's like the drunk who T-boned your car criticizing how the fireman is cutting you out of the wreckage.

Doug Molitor, Covina


To the editor: Bolton insists that the U.S. needs to eliminate the zone of ambiguity between NATO and Russia, "even if Obama's flaccid leadership has tragically lost Crimea for good."

I hope the following question will not sound rhetorical: For whom is Crimea lost?

There is a famous saying: Speech was given to man to hide his thoughts. Bolton does not want to hide his thoughts: Crimea is lost for NATO.

Vladimir Bogorad, Chatsworth

Copyright © 2015, Los Angeles Times
Related Content
  • Marriage equality: a right is a right

    Marriage equality: a right is a right

    To the editor: Descriptions such as “restraint” or “intervention” seem inappropriate when describing our current Supreme Court justices. I prefer the terms “unreasonable” or “reasonable.” (“Same-sex marriage ruling highlights Supreme Court quandary: Restraint or intervention?,” June 29)Unreasonable...

  • Obamacare decision: Lawyers doing what lawyers do

    Obamacare decision: Lawyers doing what lawyers do

    To the editor: I was startled to read the opinion piece by David B. Rivkin Jr. and Elizabeth Price Foley on King vs. Burwell. (“A terrible precedent,” Opinion, June 29) Clearly there are some good arguments pro and con, and a literalist interpretation of what appears to have been a typographical...

  • Don't blame the electric cars

    To the editor: Dear Gov. Jerry Brown: My family is doing what we can to save the environment. (“Rough road,” July 1) 

  • Religion at work

    Religion at work

    To the editor: Would the Texas attorney general condone county clerks of one religion refusing to issue building permits to construct houses of worship for another religion? (“Vows against gay marriage,” June 30) Could a religiously pacifist clerk in Texas refuse to issue concealed-carry handgun...

  • A helping hand for the homeless

    A helping hand for the homeless

    To the editor: I read with amazement the article detailing the decision of the Los Angeles City Council. (“Stop punishing the homeless,” Opinion, June 30)

  • Why can't we watch the police?

    To the editor: Unlike many countries in which officers are unarmed while performing routine duties on the streets, we have armed our police and given them the authority to kill members of our community as needed. (“Big test for police video in Gardena,” June 30)