Opinion Top of the Ticket

'Obama gifts' comment shows Romney is clueless about the real USA

In a postmortem of his campaign, Mitt Romney blamed his loss on President Obama’s "gifts" to key voting groups, thereby demonstrating, one last time, how he does not understand the country he hoped to lead. Meanwhile, Paul Ryan's poor showing in his own hometown indicates how out of touch he is with the community he claimed to know so well. 

Maybe that lack of perception is one reason why these two aspirants for the highest offices in the land fell short of their goal.

As many pundits have noted, Romney's characterization of government programs as gifts was an echo of his earlier disparaging remarks about the 47% of Americans who pay no income taxes. On both occasions, he was speaking privately with a bunch of fat-cat contributors and reinforcing their demeaning stereotypes of less fortunate Americans. It seems that Romney cannot help but be himself when he is around rich people.

PHOTOS: Top of the Ticket cartoons

The so-called gifts Obama gave included partial forgiveness of student loans, a provision of Obamacare allowing young people to stay on their parents' healthcare plans to age 26, suspension of deportations for immigrant children who have grown up in the United States and healthcare for people who otherwise do not have it or cannot afford it.

What Romney calls gifts, others call lending a hand -- no different than helping people hit by a hurricane. They are programs aimed at providing opportunities for people struggling to get a start in life or rise up from chronic poverty. They are a means to end dependency and create more productive citizens. Other Republicans apparently understand this. As Los Angeles Times reporter Morgan Little described in a Sunday article, several prominent GOP leaders have taken hard shots at Romney’s elitism in recent days.

"I think it's nuts," Newt Gingrich said on ABC's "This Week." "I mean, first of all, it's insulting. The job of a political leader, in part, is to understand the people. If we can't offer a better future that is believable to more people, we're not going to win."

Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal has been openly critical since the day Romney made his loser's remarks.

"We as a Republican Party have to campaign for every single vote," Jindal said. "If we want people to like us, we have to like them first. And you don't start to like people by insulting them and saying their votes were bought."

Romney may now retire to the comfort of the country club and his several spacious homes, but his former running mate still has a political career to protect. Ryan is stuck trying to explain how he lost the vote in his own hometown. All along the campaign trail in the cozy communities of Iowa, Ohio, Florida and elsewhere, Ryan told audiences he identified with them because he is just a guy from a small town too. Glossing over the fact he has spent almost his entire adult life climbing the political ladder in Washington, Ryan claimed the people of Janesville, Wis., taught him what America is all about.

Well, the voters of Janesville favored the Obama/Biden ticket by a 25% margin over Romney and Ryan. Ryan was also on the ballot running for reelection to Congress and, though he won his district, the good folks in Janesville preferred his opponent by a 10-point margin.

"When you join a national ticket for a party, you become more seen as a Republican guy than necessarily a Janesville guy," Ryan said in an interview on WCLO, Janesville's radio station. "So I think my image, or the thought people had in their minds of me once I joined the Republican ticket, was more 'Paul Ryan, Republican,' than 'Paul Ryan, Janesville guy.'"

Ryan's analysis hits closer to the truth than Romney's. Voters in Janesville and all around the country came to see Romney and Ryan as a certain kind of Republican -- the kind that interprets a helping hand as a gift for freeloaders -- and a majority decided they did not like what they saw.

Copyright © 2014, Los Angeles Times
Related Content
  • Obama's data geeks have made Karl Rove and Dick Morris obsolete
    Obama's data geeks have made Karl Rove and Dick Morris obsolete

    After what the Obama campaign accomplished with a backroom filled with 20-something math geeks, American presidential politics will never be the same.

  • Same-sex marriage is creating a new divide in the United States
    Same-sex marriage is creating a new divide in the United States

    Journalist and gay activist Dan Savage often writes about the urban archipelago -- the American cities that are comfortable, safe islands for gays and lesbians set amid a vast sea of countryside where being openly homosexual remains a chancy, even dangerous, proposition. However, after an...

  • Would it hurt City Hall to look into rise in worker injury claims?
    Would it hurt City Hall to look into rise in worker injury claims?

    The cost of paying salaries to Los Angeles civilian workers who are temporarily disabled because they have been hurt on the job has gone up 50% over five years, reaching $18 million last year. Employees are claiming more injuries and taking longer injury leaves. City officials don't know why...

  • Should non-citizens in the U.S. vote?
    Should non-citizens in the U.S. vote?

    As of Jan. 1, 2012, an estimated 13.3 million lawful permanent residents lived in the United States, and 8.8 million of them were eligible to apply for U.S. citizenship but had not done so. In California, 2.48 million out of 3.4 million green-card holders were eligible to apply but chose not...

  • Obama's fourth-quarter foreign policy surprises
    Obama's fourth-quarter foreign policy surprises

    Six months ago, President Obama's foreign policy looked stymied. Negotiations with Israel and the Palestinians were at a dead end. Russia was gaining ground in eastern Ukraine. U.S. efforts to end the war in Syria were ineffective. A new extremist army, Islamic State, was marching into Iraq.

  • Ukraine should put Russia to the test
    Ukraine should put Russia to the test

    Ukraine is now strong enough to seize the initiative to create a lasting cease-fire in its Donbas Rust Belt, currently occupied by Russia and its proxies. And Russia may be weak enough to be receptive. It is in Kiev's interest to do so. A state of permanent war with Russia would damage...

Comments
Loading