Television
Emmys 2014: List of nominees
OpinionTop of the Ticket

Supreme Court healthcare ruling could hurt Obama either way

ElectionsPoliticsCrime, Law and JusticeMitt RomneyRick SantorumJerry SpringerAnthony Kennedy

When the U.S. Supreme Court rules on the constitutionality of the federal mandate to buy health insurance, who is most likely to take a political hit, President Obama or Mitt Romney?

The skeptical tone of the questioning during oral arguments before the high court on Tuesday did not bode well for fans of the new healthcare law famously nicknamed "Obamacare." Chief Justice John G. RobertsJr.and the perennial swing voter, Justice Anthony Kennedy, are expected to cast the deciding votes between the liberal and conservative factions on the the court, and both seemed wary of ratifying the federal government's right to require every citizen's participation in a health plan.

An argument can be made that if the mandate is tossed out by the justices, the likely Republican presidential nominee, Mitt Romney, will no longer be able to get away with talking vaguely about getting rid of "Obamacare" on his first day in office and will have to actually produce a detailed plan for salvaging the American healthcare system. On the other hand, if the mandate is upheld by the court, Romney would continue to be stuck with his tortured explanation of why the mandate-driven Massachusetts healthcare plan -- "Romneycare," as Rick Santorum derisively terms it -- is in any significant way different from the federal plan.

Handling the healthcare issue was always going to be problematic for Romney, though. It seems the court's intrusion into the issue raises tougher issues for the president. If the mandate is scuttled, Obama's chief domestic achievement will be seriously jeopardized and the court will have ruled that he tried to do something unconstitutional. If the court decides in his favor, however, Republican voters already freaked out by the fear that Obama is a raving socialist will be even more energized, seeing a Republican victory in November as the only way to keep Obamacare from turning the USA into the USSR.

Democrats have done such a miserable job explaining and defending their healthcare scheme that a more militant right wing could dominate the general election discourse with new paranoid scenarios about "death panels" and mandates to eat broccoli (the broccoli argument having already been introduced into the high court conversation by Justice Antonin Scalia).

The fact is, there are reasonable arguments on both sides of the mandate debate. That is why Roberts and Kennedy may yet surprise the country with what they decide. Reasonable people could go either way. The court is the only place healthcare can be discussed reasonably, however. When the issue gets addressed on the campaign trail, do not expect reason to hold sway. Instead, look for a lot of red-faced people pointing fingers and shouting at each other like misfit couples on Jerry Springer.

Copyright © 2014, Los Angeles Times
Related Content
ElectionsPoliticsCrime, Law and JusticeMitt RomneyRick SantorumJerry SpringerAnthony Kennedy
  • Charlie Beck's prolific pen: A look back at the LAPD chief's letters
    Charlie Beck's prolific pen: A look back at the LAPD chief's letters

    Since taking the helm of the Los Angeles Police Department, Charlie Beck has been one of the more prolific letter-writing chiefs. The Times has published five of his often lengthy letters since he became chief in 2009, and — as one would expect — nearly all of Beck's missives take issue with...

  • CHP beating video spotlights a problem that needs more attention
    CHP beating video spotlights a problem that needs more attention

    The video is jarring in its brutality: A California Highway Patrol officer kneels on Marlene Pinnock, a 51-year-old homeless woman, and punches her repeatedly in the head. But wait — haven't we seen this movie before? In 2011, Fullerton police beat to death Kelly Thomas, a mentally ill...

  • L.A.'s missed chance to count the homeless
    L.A.'s missed chance to count the homeless

    Counting the homeless in Los Angeles County may not be as difficult as housing them all, but it is a daunting challenge nonetheless. In early 2013, an army of 5,000 volunteers, under the direction of the Los Angeles Homeless Services Authority — a joint agency of the county and city — fanned...

  • Runoff runaround at the L.A. Community College District

    Two years ago, Gov. Jerry Brown signed a peculiarly anti-democratic bill into law, ending the requirement that the Los Angeles Community College District hold runoff elections for the board of trustees. In late June, the board voted 4 to 2, with one abstention, to take advantage of that new...

  • Why should unions negotiate for workers who don't pay their fair share?
    Why should unions negotiate for workers who don't pay their fair share?

    Last week in Harris vs. Quinn, the U.S. Supreme Court put unions in a bind when it ruled that unionized home-care workers cannot be required to pay for the representation that unions are required by law to provide to them. In cases across the country, including at least one in California...

  • What do the Hobby Lobby backers want women to be?
    What do the Hobby Lobby backers want women to be?

    In the fallout surrounding last week's Supreme Court Hobby Lobby decision, a lot of people have been wondering exactly what role the Christian right thinks women should play in society and how birth control detracts from it.

Comments
Loading