Opinion
Get Opinion in your inbox -- sign up for our weekly newsletter
Top of the Ticket
Opinion Top of the Ticket

Rich gain clout as Supreme Court kills political spending limits

America has seen some impressive winning streaks -- the Chicago Bulls with Michael Jordan, the New York Yankees for half the 20thcentury, Tiger Woods until his wife caught him with his putter on the wrong green --– but few can surpass the string of wins being racked up by rich people. And now, thanks to the U.S. Supreme Court’s conservatives, the super-wealthy can take another victory lap.

On Wednesday, in a 5-4 ruling, the highest court in the land took one more big step toward eliminating all the campaign finance laws that have been enacted since the Watergate scandal in the 1970s. This time they struck down limits on the amount of money any individual can give to candidates running for the House and Senate.

Following the earlier Citizens United ruling that said corporations are free to spend as much money as they want to independently influence election campaigns, this new decision further enhances the power of millionaires and billionaires in the American political process.

“Taken together with Citizens United, today’s decision eviscerates our nation’s campaign finance laws,” Justice Stephen G. Breyer said in his dissent from the ruling. Some observers predict that the path is now open for the court to kill every remaining restraint on spending in elections.

By the presidential campaign in 2020, the role of money in American politics is likely to have returned to the unencumbered condition of the 1890s Gilded Age when rich robber barons could spend freely to buy a compliant Congress that would look after their interests.

That era was good for the rich, but, as the century turned, those with great fortunes began to feel the squeeze. Politicians they could not buy instituted child labor laws, a 40-hour workweek, an eight-hour workday, regulations on food safety, the income tax and the first protections for the environment. By the time of the Eisenhower administration, the tax rate on the rich was at the highest level in U.S. history, while the gap between the wealthy and the poor was the smallest and the middle class was the strongest.

In the 1980s, though, the Reagan Revolution returned conservatives to power and a new winning streak for the rich began. Taxes on big money started a long downward slide, pay packages for corporate executives skyrocketed and the financial sector dislodged itself from the rest of the economy by creating vast new wealth from thin air. Even when the economic collapse of 2008 hit, most rich people were insulated from its effects. They just continued to grow richer.

Today, the divide between the top 1% and everyone else is as wide as it has ever been and one political party is single-mindedly devoted to opposing any effort by the other party to narrow that gap. That party is the Republican, and they are celebrating the latest Supreme Court decision with great enthusiasm. They know most of the additional millions of dollars that rich people can now spend on campaigns will be directed to them.

It will be the Republicans’ reward -- an investment by the rich to guarantee that their winning streak goes on and on.

Copyright © 2015, Los Angeles Times
Related Content
  • Democrats may face bigger Obamacare blowback from voters in 2016

    Democrats may face bigger Obamacare blowback from voters in 2016

    If Democrats think the botched rollout of the Obamacare web site has handicapped them in the 2014 congressional elections, they should be ready for worse to come. Unhappiness with the negative effects of the healthcare law could produce even nastier consequences for Democrats in 2016. 

  • Return to New Orleans - an open hand, a welcome home

    Return to New Orleans - an open hand, a welcome home

    Like most people with people "at home" in New Orleans, I found myself both here and there in 2005. By late August, I was daily monitoring weather maps two time zones away. I watched how a "tropical system" gathered force, how it garnered enough ferocity to be granted a name. Katrina looked serious,...

  • A treasure hunter, an L.A. park and the curse of the severed hand

    A treasure hunter, an L.A. park and the curse of the severed hand

    Recently I took up metal detecting as a hobby. While Los Angeles is, of course, the greatest place to live in the world, our city parks are too new to offer much excitement for "dirt fishers." The East Coast, with its deep-rooted (though not-so-deeply-buried) history, is more fertile.

  • Making the Gun Free School Zone Act better

    Making the Gun Free School Zone Act better

    For the last 20 years it has been illegal in California to carry a firearm within 1,000 feet of an elementary or secondary school or on the grounds of a college, trade school or university, whether public or private. The Gun Free School Zone Act, which paralleled a similarly named federal measure,...

  • Weighing the Iran nuclear deal: far from perfect, but the alternatives are worse

    Weighing the Iran nuclear deal: far from perfect, but the alternatives are worse

    The historic agreement reached after 20 months of negotiations between Iran, the U.S. and five other world powers holds out hope that for the next 10 or 15 years the ability of the Islamic Republic to develop a nuclear weapon will be significantly limited. It is far from a perfect deal, it promises...

  • Baby boomers, don't be so quick to mock colleges on 'trigger warnings' and 'micro-aggressions'

    Baby boomers, don't be so quick to mock colleges on 'trigger warnings' and 'micro-aggressions'

    Everyone knows that kids find their elders deeply uncool. We'll reveal our own uncoolness by citing John Sebastian's 1969 song "Younger Generation" to prove the point. "Why must every generation think their folks are square?" he asks. The lyrics go on to offer an uncomfortable futuristic scenario:...

Comments
Loading
70°