CALIFORNIA
Sign up for the Essential California newsletter to get great stories delivered to your inbox
World World Now

House GOP absolves military, slams administration in Benghazi attack

WASHINGTON -- The U.S diplomatic facility in Benghazi, Libya. was "woefully vulnerable" prior to the deadly 2012 attack by militants, according to a report by House Republicans on the incident that blames the Obama administration for failing to beef up security.

The report, released Tuesday by Republicans on the House Armed Services Committee, contains few new revelations about the Benghazi attack, which has sparked a long-running partisan battle.

It debunks one of the persistent claims about the response to the incident: that the U.S. military was ordered to "stand down" instead of going to the aid of Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens, who was killed along with another American when attackers stormed the facility and set it on fire. Two other Americans were slain the following morning by mortar fire on a nearby CIA post.

"There was no 'stand down' order issued to U.S. military personnel in Tripoli," the report says, blaming the claim on "confusion" about the facts arising from what it termed inadequate previous reviews.

It quotes Gen. Martin Dempsey, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, as saying that once troops were ordered to attempt to move to Libya, "nothing stopped us, nothing slowed us."

No troops arrived in Benghazi in time to assist the State Department security personnel and CIA operatives fighting the attackers, though an unarmed U.S. drone was overhead.

The report does not mention former Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, who was in office at the time of the incident and recently acknowledged the incident was her "biggest regret" while in office.

The report blames unnamed White House officials, who it says "failed to comprehend or ignored the dramatically deteriorating security situation in Libya."

It acknowledges there was no specific intelligence that the attack was coming but criticizes the administration and the State Department for not seeking to beef up the U.S. military presence amid concern about worsening security in Libya.

Like previous investigations, the Republican report largely absolves the military for failing to make it to Benghazi before the attack was over. U.S troops and aircraft in Europe and in the U.S. were not positioned to respond quickly enough, it says.

[For the record, 12:32 p.m. PSTon Feb. 11: An early version of this post stated that four Americas died in the attack on the diplomatic post. Ambassador Stevens and another American were killed at the site; two other Americans were slain the following morning by mortar fire on a nearby CIA post.]

david.cloud@latimes.com

Twitter: @davidcloudLAT

Copyright © 2015, Los Angeles Times
Related Content
  • Senate panel issues harsh report on Benghazi attack

    Senate panel issues harsh report on Benghazi attack

    Senate Intelligence Committee says the 2012 attack in Benghazi, Libya, that killed four Americans might have been prevented.

  • Why Republicans can't let go of Benghazi

    Why Republicans can't let go of Benghazi

    More than a year after four Americans died in a terrorist attack in Benghazi, Libya, the New York Times has published a story reporting 1) that it found “no evidence that Al Qaeda or other international terrorist groups had any role in the assault” and 2) that “contrary to claims by some members...

Comments
Loading