L.A. City Council to vote on measure to restrict e-cigarette ‘vaping’
The L.A. City Council is expected vote Tuesday on a proposal to treat e-cigarettes like conventional cigarettes and prohibit them in nearly every workplace and many outdoor spaces.
Lobbyists for the e-cigarette industry have been pushing back, and want to secure exemptions for establishments where “vaping” -- taking a drag of flavored nicotine vapor from an e-cigarette -- is increasingly popular.
Backers of the battery-powered e-cigarettes portray them as a godsend for those looking to quit conventional smoking. They say research has not yet proven that the second-hand emissions are harmful to others.
City officials proposed the ordinance after Jonathan Fielding, director of the Los Angeles County Department of Public Health, said e-cigarettes threatened to make smoking socially acceptable after years of public opinion campaigns to discourage the habit.
Young people who get hooked on the nicotine in e-cigarettes may then turn to tobacco use, he said.
“We don’t want to risk e-cigarettes undermining a half century of successful tobacco control,” he said.
The ordinance would ban the use of e-cigarettes in most workplaces as well as parks, on city beaches, in restaurant outdoor dining areas and at city-sponsored farmers markets.
One exception to the proposed e-cigarettes ban would be “vaping lounges,” businesses that allow customers to try various e-cigarette liquids. Those liquids, which typically include nicotine and flavorings, are heated in an e-cigarette until they vaporize and can be inhaled.
ALSO:
Disney ‘very forthright’ on cutting Boy Scouts funding over gay policy
O.C. gets more than 1,000 concealed gun applications in just weeks
Jimmy Kimmel pits Toronto Mayor Rob Ford against L.A.’s Eric Garcetti
Twitter: @davidzahniser
More to Read
Start your day right
Sign up for Essential California for news, features and recommendations from the L.A. Times and beyond in your inbox six days a week.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.