Questions for the candidates

Forget the gossipy stuff. Here are10 topics we'd like to hear the presidential candidates' views on.
April 28, 2008

» Discuss Article    (60 Comments)

After the Democratic slugfest also known as the Pennsylvania primary, many voters can no longer bear to listen to the candidates. Even some who became political junkies during this historic race have now tuned out the sniping over guns, bitterness, race, religion, geriatric radicals and other trivia. We pray the next president will not waste a millisecond thinking about many of the headline topics of the last month. All three candidates should challenge reporters who dwell on gossipy or tangential subjects to ask instead about issues voters care about -- or should. Herewith are 10 questions the American people deserve to hear answered.

To Sen. John McCain:

1. Why did you skip the Senate vote on extending unemployment benefits for the jobless? Do you oppose extending unemployment and food stamp benefits?

2. You voted with Senate Republicans to block legislation that would have allowed workers belatedly discovering discrimination to file lawsuits, and said women living in poverty need more education and training to close the wage gap. Please explain how more education for the victims of discrimination would end the practice, and how you would pay for the training while keeping your promise not to raise taxes.

To Sens. Barack Obama and Hillary Rodham Clinton:

3. Now that the equal-pay legislationhas failed, what would you do to ensure that women are not still averaging 77% of men's wages four years from now?

4. How would you stimulate this country out of its economic doldrums at the same time as you allow the Bush tax cuts to expire, thereby sharply raising taxes for some?

5. Some warn that pulling U.S. troops out of Iraq in 2009 may trigger a regional war, drawing Iran, Saudi Arabia and even Turkey into a weakened state. Are there any circumstances under which you would halt U.S. troop withdrawals -- or order more troops into Iraq?

6. You have criticized President Bush's expansion of executive power. Detail for us how you intend to legally forbid yourself -- and your successors -- from using signing statements to alter legislation. Don't tell us that your judgment will be better than Bush's, so not to worry. Give us specifics.

To all three candidates:

7. U.S. military commanders are warning that Iran poses a greater threat than Al Qaeda to the stability of Iraq. How should the U.S. respond? Are there any circumstances under which you would deem it necessary for the U.S. to attack Iran? And don't brush this off by saying you don't answer hypothetical questions -- it's no longer hypothetical.

8. Now that it's clear that ethanol production is contributing to the run-up in world food prices, do you still support ethanol mandates and subsidies? If so, how would you ameliorate the global food crisis?

9. How exactly would you ensure that no American citizen can be declared an "enemy combatant"? Explain what you believe a president ought and ought not to be able to do with a foreigner captured abroad and suspected of having plans to kill Americans.

10. Describe a situation in which you would defend the president's asserted power to monitor telephone conversations and e-mails of U.S. citizens without a warrant.





Post Comment

Name
Enter your comments and post to forum
By participating you agree to our Terms of Service and represent that you are not under the age of 13.
 
Discussion


Discuss today's editorial.

Comments will close after two days.
 
1. When I did the research for Why Men Earn More, I discovered that the pay gap was about 25 work-life differences among men and women. Each of men's decisions led to higher pay; each of women's lead to a better life. I discovered that the road to high pay is a toll road--that anyone who pays the tolls of working more hours, or hazardous jobs, or relocating more frequently, or working in technical careers will earn more. High pay and a good life are about trade-offs.
Submitted by: warren farrell
11:18 AM PDT, Apr 30, 2008
 
2. To all three candidates (question regarding Civil Service/Spousal Soc Security)........???? I am a retired CSRS gov't employee with a low retirement pay. My concern is why can't I draw my husbands' Soc Sec one day rather than being penalized and denied just b/c I was a gov't worker for 30-years. Folks who did not work at all are entitled to their husband's Soc Sec and for me I worked hard all my life and it is like a slap in the face for working. My husband worked hard all his life since he was 15 years old; and I think he/spouse should be entitled. Thank you for you comments in your future commentaries on this subject.
Submitted by: W Matthews
8:13 AM PDT, Apr 29, 2008
 
3. Social Security could have been funded for 100 years with what fraternity lad- cheerleader Bush spent & is spending on his wars & giving away to "faith-based" parasites who take jobs best left to professionals. His 8 years are spent keeping "defense contractors" as sleek dogs in the manger, preventing Congress from feeding domestic needs from our treasuries. Not too late to impeach.
Submitted by: For #10--Fix Social Security
8:42 PM PDT, Apr 28, 2008
 



The senator's Berlin speech was radical and naive.

   
The best in Southern California opinion journalism, Monday through Friday
Former Timesman finally makes good
At the L.A. Times it often seems that the only kind of colleagues we have are...
more »
Jon Healey on Hollywood's love-hate relationship with technology.
A Paramount movie integrated into Sony web programming
This is so meta, I'm having trouble wrapping my brain around it. Today Bebo...
more »
 

ADVERTISEMENT



The Tottori Sand Museum in Japan is showcasing sculptures of UNESCO World Heritage sites in Asia.