California | Local
National
World
Business
Sports
Washington
Science
Environment
Opinion
Entertainment The Hot List Company Town Arts & Culture Calendar The Envelope TV Listings Movie Showtimes
Travel Health Autos Home & Garden Food Image Books Brand X Magazine
Data Desk
Photography
Obituaries
Crosswords/Sudoku
Your Scene
Blogs
Columnists
Print Edition
Readers Rep
Corrections
All Sections
Buy, Sell & More Jobs Cars latcars Real Estate Foreclosure Sale Rentals Personals Local Values Coupons Newspaper Ads
Place an Ad In the Newspaper Online
Settings/Services Sign In Register E-Mail Newsletters
RSS Feeds
Help
Contact Us
L.A. Times Archives
Reprint Requests
Work for Us
Home Delivery Customer Support Subscribe
Entertainment The Hot List Company Town Arts & Culture Calendar The Envelope TV Listings Movie Showtimes
Travel Health Autos Home & Garden Food Image Books Brand X Magazine
Buy, Sell & More Jobs Cars latcars Real Estate Foreclosure Sale Rentals Personals Local Values Coupons Newspaper Ads
Place an Ad In the Newspaper Online
Settings/Services Sign In Register E-Mail Newsletters
RSS Feeds
Help
Contact Us
L.A. Times Archives
Reprint Requests
Work for Us
Home Delivery Customer Support Subscribe
BLOWBACK
Israel’s ties that bind
Shared history and values, not the lobby, unite Israel and the U.S.
» Discuss Article
(17 Comments)
Although John J. Mearsheimer and Stephen M. Walt accuse the "Israel lobby" of bullying American politicians into a positive relationship with Israel, the truth is that the long-standing U.S.-Israel alliance exists because it is good for America.
President Bush, like his predecessors, determines U.S. policy toward Israel, but the relationship is far deeper than the ideology of an individual president. What makes the countries' friendship so strong is not just geopolitics but the web of military, economic, academic and personal connections.
President Bush, like his predecessors, determines U.S. policy toward Israel, but the relationship is far deeper than the ideology of an individual president. What makes the countries' friendship so strong is not just geopolitics but the web of military, economic, academic and personal connections.
One pillar of the special relationship is mutual strategic interests. Until the mid-1960s, State Department and Pentagon officials argued that Israel did not need American arms because it was strong enough to defend itself and had other arms sources. They also said that selling U.S. arms to Israel would alienate Arab states, which could seek weapons from the Soviets and Chinese, thus sparking a Middle East arms race.
U.S. policy shifted when, disregarding State Department objections, President Kennedy sold antiaircraft missiles to Israel shortly after Egypt obtained long-range bombers from the USSR. President Johnson subsequently provided Israel with tanks and aircraft, balancing these sales with arms transfers to Arab countries. But Johnson's sale of Phantom jets to Israel in 1968 established the U.S. as Israel's principal arms supplier and ensured Israel's qualitative military edge over its neighbors.
President Reagan formalized this strategic relationship in a 1981 agreement to "enhance strategic cooperation to deter all threats from the Soviet Union to the region." By the end of Reagan's term, the U.S. had pre-positioned equipment in Israel, held regular joint training exercises and began co-development of the Arrow anti-tactical ballistic missile and other cooperative military endeavors. Israel became a de facto American ally, and the Arab states learned that the U.S. was not afraid to risk upsetting them.
U.S. policy shifted when, disregarding State Department objections, President Kennedy sold antiaircraft missiles to Israel shortly after Egypt obtained long-range bombers from the USSR. President Johnson subsequently provided Israel with tanks and aircraft, balancing these sales with arms transfers to Arab countries. But Johnson's sale of Phantom jets to Israel in 1968 established the U.S. as Israel's principal arms supplier and ensured Israel's qualitative military edge over its neighbors.
President Reagan formalized this strategic relationship in a 1981 agreement to "enhance strategic cooperation to deter all threats from the Soviet Union to the region." By the end of Reagan's term, the U.S. had pre-positioned equipment in Israel, held regular joint training exercises and began co-development of the Arrow anti-tactical ballistic missile and other cooperative military endeavors. Israel became a de facto American ally, and the Arab states learned that the U.S. was not afraid to risk upsetting them.
Another pillar is shared values. While living in a region dominated by autocracies, Israelis have a commitment to democracy no less passionate than that of Americans. All citizens of Israel, regardless of race, religion or sex, are guaranteed equality before the law and full democratic rights. Israel's independent judiciary vigorously upholds these rights. The political system differs slightly from America's — Israel's is a parliamentary democracy — but it is still based on free elections with divergent parties.
Joint ventures are the third pillar. Reagan expanded the scope of these joint activities that existed since the 1950s, creating partnerships between nearly every U.S. government agency - from NASA to the Environmental Protection Agency to the Department of Health and Human Services - and their Israeli counterparts. The collaborative research has produced innovations that benefit people around the world.
The relationship extends beyond the federal government to the state and local level. A milestone in these contacts occurred with the 1984 creation of the Texas-Israel Exchange, promoting projects in agriculture. Since then, at least 23 other states have signed agreements with Israel to increase cooperation in trade, tourism, research, culture and other activities of interest to individual states. The financial benefits to the states from bilateral agreements can also be substantial, considering that 17 states exported at least $100.million worth of goods to Israel in 2006, and three exported more than $500.million, with New York leading the way with $4.6. billion.
Critics want to see an all-powerful lobby as the reason for America's pro-Israel policy, but they have chosen to focus on an ungainly tree amid the forest of flourishing ties between the two nations. The real reasons for the U.S.-Israel relationship are far more complex and beneficial to the United States than Mearsheimer and Walt imagine.
Mitchell Bard is the director of the Jewish Virtual Library and the author of "Will Israel Survive?"
Joint ventures are the third pillar. Reagan expanded the scope of these joint activities that existed since the 1950s, creating partnerships between nearly every U.S. government agency - from NASA to the Environmental Protection Agency to the Department of Health and Human Services - and their Israeli counterparts. The collaborative research has produced innovations that benefit people around the world.
The relationship extends beyond the federal government to the state and local level. A milestone in these contacts occurred with the 1984 creation of the Texas-Israel Exchange, promoting projects in agriculture. Since then, at least 23 other states have signed agreements with Israel to increase cooperation in trade, tourism, research, culture and other activities of interest to individual states. The financial benefits to the states from bilateral agreements can also be substantial, considering that 17 states exported at least $100.million worth of goods to Israel in 2006, and three exported more than $500.million, with New York leading the way with $4.6. billion.
Critics want to see an all-powerful lobby as the reason for America's pro-Israel policy, but they have chosen to focus on an ungainly tree amid the forest of flourishing ties between the two nations. The real reasons for the U.S.-Israel relationship are far more complex and beneficial to the United States than Mearsheimer and Walt imagine.
Mitchell Bard is the director of the Jewish Virtual Library and the author of "Will Israel Survive?"
|
Post Comment |
Discussion Who or what has the most say over Israel policy? Discuss today's Blowback. Comments will close after two weeks.
1. I will only comment on the shared values. The passionate commitment to democracy remains however an empty shell when there is no constitutional law as is the case in Israel. Then how are the human rights for "Israelic Arabs" implemented? Lets see, the budget for their basic education is roughly a third of the budget for an Israelic Jew .
Equality before the law? Then why can a Jew citizen in Israel have his relatives from abroad become Israelic citizens, while an Israelic (Arab) citizen can not?
The points of shared values are all empty shells ,I'm afraid.
Submitted by: Leo Germeys 2:11 PM PST, Jan 16, 2008 Submitted by: Keith Johnsen 2:32 PM PST, Jan 13, 2008 Submitted by: Abbott Gleason 5:08 AM PST, Jan 13, 2008 |
|
OPINION »
Under the country's Constitution, the ouster of President Manuel Zelaya was legal. Dust-Up: Is Sarah Palin still the GOP's star? |
 |
The best in Southern California opinion journalism
In today's Los Angeles Times editorial pages, race. Aren't we past all that? No....
The business and culture of our digital lives, from the L.A. Times
If the numbers were so stark, why did it take a virtual eternity for...
|
||
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
National Headlines
