BREAKING NEWS: Jazz beat Lakers 123-115 to tie series, 2-2
BLOWBACK

A new water strategy

Without one, the entire California economy is at risk.
By George Deukmejian, Pete Wilson and Gray Davis
May 8, 2008
» Discuss Article    (16 Comments)

The Times' recent story, "Water shortage worst in decades," illustrates an often forgotten fact. Southern California is really a semi-arid desert -- brought to life by water supplies from the Colorado River, the Owens Valley and the State Water Project to supplement our local supplies. Our reliance on this imported water to meet the region's future needs puts us at ever greater risk. Future water supply reliability will increasingly depend on local self-help measures such as conservation, reuse, more below-ground storage of surplus supplies and even desalination.

But more important and far more urgent is the serious threat we face today of real water shortages for much of the state because of the crisis in the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta. Collapse of its strained ecosystem and its labyrinth of unstable levees from flood or earthquake could gravely reduce, or even suspend, deliveries from the State Water Project serving not only Southern California but users in the San Francisco Bay Area, the San Joaquin Valley and the Central Coast. California's entire economy is at risk.

 
    How do we address these threats to the viability of our quality of life and our economy? First, we offer our support for a statewide solution for the delta, which would address ecosystem concerns and stabilize the water supply. Such a solution must include a new water conveyance infrastructure, funded by those who benefit from the system improvement. Second, we must move forward on Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger's call for a statewide 20% "across the board" water conservation effort. The business community can demonstrate its leadership in this effort. Third, Southern California's Metropolitan Water District, local water agencies and the private water sector should begin to explore new strategic efforts in addition to their conservation and reuse initiatives. They should maximize local water resources by partnering -- employing transportation and exchange arrangements -- to use the extensive pipeline network and underground storage facilities throughout Southern California. Other regions should consider similar plans.

    Finally, our state leaders need to reach agreement on a comprehensive statewide water infrastructure plan, including bond funds for a delta solution and local water reliability projects.

    All this will cause our water service to cost more in the future. But going without a critically needed water supply is simply not an option.

    George Deukmejian, Pete Wilson, and Gray Davis are former governors of California and charter members of the Southern California Leadership Council.

    Blowback is an online forum for full-length responses to our articles, editorials and Op-Eds. Click here to read more about Blowback, or submit your own by e-mailing us at opinionla@latimes.com.





    Post Comment

    Name
    Enter your comments and post to forum
    By participating you agree to our Terms of Service and represent that you are not under the age of 13.
     
    Discussion


    Discuss today's Blowback.

    Comments will close after two days.
     
    1. Apparently you do not need to understand simple mathematics to be a governor of California. All the cities and households in California use just 11% of all the water. Even if a huge investment is made in household conservation and the Gov's goal of 20% reduction is achieved, the available water supply increases about 2%, not much more than a rounding error. On the other hand, if California's huge agribusinesses, which use and waste 80% of all California water, conserved 20%, 16% of all California water would become available and the non-existent water problem would disappear.
    Submitted by: drjwtaylor
    12:02 PM PDT, May 9, 2008
     
    2. The Three Stooges live. The old nonsense from three guys who have spent their lives at the public trough.
    Submitted by: Jack in L.A.
    4:41 PM PDT, May 8, 2008
     
    3. So out of one corner of this newspaper's mouth they are talking about the approval of 26,000 new homes in North L.A. County. Now here we are talking about a water crisis. Duh! When are we going to wake up and see that we cannot sustain this kind of growth with the water that is available. Are the politicians listening? Are they connecting the dots? Or do we need to follow the money?
    Submitted by: JR
    3:36 PM PDT, May 8, 2008
     




    The planet has passed a tipping point on climate change, and it gets much worse, fast.

       
     

    ADVERTISEMENT



    If it's good enough for Jessica Alba, then why not the rest of the new moms out there? Video | More gift ideas