On the case of an L.A. firefighter

Re “Council backs mayor’s veto in race bias case,” Nov. 30

Finally, the City Council displays a willingness to exercise prudent fiscal responsibility with taxpayer dollars. Unfortunately, it took the mayor’s veto of the council-approved $2.7-million settlement with firefighter Tennie Pierce, and an outcry by taxpayers, for the council to come to its senses and uphold the veto. This entire incident was nothing more than a sophomoric prank played on a prankster by fellow pranksters.

Unacceptable behavior in the workplace? Yes. An incident worthy of a $2.7-million settlement? No. If Pierce and his legal team really believe they have a case, let them take it to trial, where the evidence will speak for itself.

GARY ROGNESS

Santa Clarita

*

If City Atty. Rocky Delgadillo knew of the pictures of Pierce hazing others, and his deputy told the City Council the pictures show that Pierce’s claim was “silly,” why did Delgadillo recommend paying out $2.7 million of taxpayers’ money?

JACK FINE

Los Angeles

*

Regarding pranks among firefighters, why would adult men even be allowed to behave like adolescents? There has to be a more civilized way for professionals to entertain themselves and “bond.” It’s no surprise that hostile humor has a dangerous potential to escalate. It’s time for pranks and hostile humor to be banned, period.

ANN STRAUCH

Rancho Palos Verdes

*

Re “Chief’s hiring raised hopes,” Nov. 30

I served Los Angeles County in law enforcement for 14 years. I have known Fire Chief William Bamattre for 19 years. In any large organization, the buck stops with the leader. But if you are going to hold Bamattre totally responsible, then the whole organization is responsible. Hazing, pranks and teasing are accepted by most individuals who enter a stressful occupation. Whether it is in law enforcement or firefighting, tradition goes a long way. Once an individual accepts hazing, pranks and practical jokes, he has accepted tradition. I know because I participated back in my day; we all have.

After all the positive strides we have made in racial equality, people still use the race card when things don’t go their way. If it’s all about pride and loyalty, why does a complainer need to sue? To hold one man responsible for the problems of a few crybabies would be irresponsible to taxpayers.

DAN HEREDIA

Dana Point