Opinion
Reading Los Angeles: Join The Times' new book club
Opinion Editorial

Britain vs. David Miranda, and Glenn Greenwald

Britain lacks a 1st Amendment.

Police at London's Heathrow Airport detained the partner and assistant of journalist Glenn Greenwald for nearly nine hours on Sunday and confiscated his cellphone and computer. It's hard to see the mistreatment of David Miranda as anything other than an attempt to intimidate Greenwald, a columnist for the Guardian newspaper who has published revelations about U.S. and British electronic surveillance programs provided by former National Security Agency contractor Edward Snowden.

Miranda, a citizen of Brazil who lives with Greenwald in that country, was passing through Heathrow on his way home from Berlin, where he met with documentary filmmaker Laura Poitras, Greenwald's collaborator in publishing material supplied by Snowden. Miranda was held under an anti-terrorism law that allows police at "border areas" to detain and question persons who might not themselves be suspected of terrorism.

It was a reasonable deduction that Miranda's computer, telephone and USB drives contained information provided by Snowden. But British authorities surely realized that copies of that information existed elsewhere, beyond their reach. That they confiscated Miranda's devices anyway suggests that their object was intimidation. So does the length of his detention; usually, travelers questioned under the anti-terrorism law are held for less than an hour.

Britain lacks a 1st Amendment, but its laws do provide for some protection for journalists' files, and lawyers for Miranda have cited those safeguards (along with European law) in threatening a legal challenge to Miranda's detention and the confiscation of his electronic devices.

Although the situations aren't perfectly parallel, journalists in this country also have experienced collateral damage from attempts by government to plug and punish leaks. For example, despite new guidelines making it harder for the Justice Department to issue subpoenas to reporters, the Obama administration has continued to demand that James Risen, a New York Times reporter, identify the source of information in one of his books about a covert operation aimed at Iran's nuclear program. The department should heed a request by Risen's lawyers that it withdraw the subpoena requiring him to testify at the trial of former CIA officer Jeffrey Sterling.

In this country as in Britain, there is a perennial tension between the government's desire to protect secrets and the press' mission to inform readers. But the public is best served when the government focuses on keeping its own house in order rather than muscling the media.

Copyright © 2015, Los Angeles Times
Related Content
  • Britain defends detaining the partner of Edward Snowden journalist
    Britain defends detaining the partner of Edward Snowden journalist

    LONDON – Stung by mounting criticism, the British government Tuesday defended the detention of the partner of an American journalist who helped reveal widespread spying by the U.S. National Security Agency, saying that authorities had a duty to act against someone suspected of possessing “highly...

  • Give Snowden his due: He made a surveillance debate possible
    Give Snowden his due: He made a surveillance debate possible

    They call it the “Snowden effect.” Whatever you think of fugitive former National Security Agency consultant Edward J. Snowden -- hero, traitor, something in between -- his revelations about electronic surveillance programs have inspired a debate about broad questions of policy that was impossible...

  • The constitutional argument for same-sex marriage
    The constitutional argument for same-sex marriage

    For some time the U.S. Supreme Court has been "leading from behind" on same-sex marriage, allowing lower court decisions to transform the legal and social landscape in large parts of the country without weighing in itself. But now the court has seized the initiative again, and we vehemently hope...

  • City Hall should hold the line on pay raises
    City Hall should hold the line on pay raises

    After nearly a year of negotiations, Los Angeles city officials and the unions representing 20,000 city workers still haven't reached a deal on a new contract. One group of employees has even threatened to strike. The standoff is caused, in part, by the city's determination not to approve any raises...

  • LAPD body camera rules not ready for prime time
    LAPD body camera rules not ready for prime time

    Los Angeles police officers will begin strapping on body cameras in just a few short months, fundamentally changing the way they interact with citizens. For the better, most people agree.

  • The Clintons lower the bar -- again
    The Clintons lower the bar -- again

    I once had a boss who gave me some great advice, not just for managing people but for judging politicians: You forgive mistakes; you punish patterns. Everybody screws up. But if someone won't learn from his mistakes and try to correct his behavior, then he either doesn't think it was a mistake...

Comments
Loading