Re "Threat from within," Opinion, March 13
While Robert English has impressive credentials as director of USC's School of International Relations, I question his view that the woes of the Ukrainians can be laid largely at the feet of the "neofascists" and American politicians trying to make points.
He fails to explain why Russian President
These are not the moves of a misunderstood leader, but rather the well-laid plans of an aspiring despot. Ignore him, underestimate him, pacify or make excuses for him at the peril of all of us, Ukraine and Eastern Europe first.
To understand Ukraine's complicated history, you have to know that it was last a fully independent country during the Middle Ages. It fell apart in the 13th century after a Mongol invasion. Later, Ukraine came under Polish domination.
Ukraine broke free from Poland during the 17th century and signed a pact with Russia in 1654 to protect itself from Poland. It soon found itself a province of the Russian Empire and later a republic of the Soviet Union. Many Ukrainians sided with Germany during its occupation in World War II because that was their only hope of independence from Russian domination.
The nationalist Svoboda party is attempting to recreate a de-Russified independent Ukraine. But it is too late, as most of eastern Ukraine is largely Russified. Russia has now basically taken
There is a lot that has been swept under the historical rug in the current crisis in Ukraine.
Much of the animosity being displayed toward Russia, including susceptibility to political extremism, has its roots in the "Holodomor," the extermination by starvation that was perpetrated by the Stalin regime in the 1930s.
Unless there is a thorough airing and acknowledgment of this horrific crime against Ukrainians and others, the psychic wounds will only fester.