The Times' Nov. 7 article, "Tight economy puts squeeze on arts organizations,” reveals that the troubles of the Pasadena Symphony, Opera Pacific and the Museum of Contemporary Art's Geffen Contemporary represent but a few examples of artistic collateral damage in Los Angeles during an economic downturn. When the economy goes down, arts are often the first to get slashed from any budget. People simply cannot afford the arts, that muse who sits too lofty on Maslow's hierarchy of needs. Or can they?
A quick observation of Pasadena's Old Town on a Saturday evening reveals crowds with still-disposable incomes huddled inside the Cheesecake Factory waiting to spend their dollars on a caloric feast. Let them eat cheesecake. Lines of designer label-clad youth still line up on Sunset Boulevard outside of the latest club du jour, willing to flash wads of cash at the barbarians at the gate to have the privilege to spend even more money on alcohol, cover charges, deafening music and the opportunity to become desensitized.
Many Angelenos have the economic means to get desensitized while denying the opportunity of refining the senses through the symphony, opera or fine art. The fading arts scene in Los Angeles is not an issue of finance; it is an issue of priorities. A friend from Russia once remarked to me, on seeing a vast sea of silver patrician heads last year in the audience of the Pasadena Symphony, that in Moscow, concerts were not the exclusive domain of well-heeled patrons, those on the upper echelons of the social ladder. Families of modest means would dine on cabbage soup for a week to be able to take their children to see the virtuoso Vladimir Horowitz in concert.
One needs only to look at Venezuela, a country where the per-capita gross domestic product hovered around $13,000 in 2007 (compared to the United States' $45,800) -- and where the youth music program operates with a budget of about $30 million annually. More than 400,000 of Venezuela's youth have participated in this program, saving themselves through musical dedication and discipline from a life of gangs, criminality and destitution. In an interview with a Boston Globe reporter, Venezuelan conductor Jose Antonio Abreu declared that musical programs in Venezuela functioned as a "weapon against poverty." In Venezuela, classical music represents a vital component of the popular culture and progress, not a sanctuary for the economic elites. If only many Angelenos could look at classical music and fine arts through the same lens: not as a luxury item, but as a central building block of the social fabric and future of our city.
The Dutch humanist and scholar Desiderius Erasmus once remarked, "When I get a little money, I buy books; and if any is left, I buy food and clothes." Unfortunately, in Los Angeles, this proverb exists in the reverse. Citizens first shell out money for dinners, libation or a fetching new outfit, with nothing left for the "Grapes of Wrath" (an opera now canceled by Opera Pacific) or the holiday concert at the Pasadena Symphony.
The arts crisis in Los Angeles is not a reflection of the economy; it is a reflection of ourselves, our desires to feed our bodies at the expense of nourishing our souls.
Leticia Marie Sanchez is the founder of Cultural Cocktail Hour, a guide to L.A.'s arts scene.
Fading L.A. arts scene is about priorities, not cash
In a tight economy, too many Angelenos jettison art spending as an unaffordable luxury to feed other expensive indulgences.
We've upgraded our reader commenting system. Learn more about the new features.
Los Angeles Times welcomes civil dialogue about our stories; you must register with the site to participate. We filter comments for language and adherence to our Terms of Service, but not for factual accuracy. By commenting, you agree to these legal terms. Please flag inappropriate comments.
Having technical problems? Check here for guidance.