Grading City Hall: See our report card for L.A. City Council President Herb Wesson
Opinion Op-Ed

If Mao and Chiang Kai-shek could defer core issues, so can Israel and the Palestinians

Israelis and Palestinians are facing their most difficult negotiation since Menachem Begin flew west to face Egyptian President Anwar Sadat a generation ago at Camp David. If Israel were to end its long occupation, if Palestinians were to unite and forswear violence, if two states were able to share an eternal capital in Jerusalem and bind up the wounds of their long enmity, then a viable Palestinian state could emerge to live in peace with its most prominent and powerful neighbor.

Sadly, the final hurdles that diplomats, chief among them Secretary of State John F. Kerry, face in organizing a new negotiation are shaped by preconditions. One of the most nettlesome is Israel's demand that the Palestinians recognize Israel as a Jewish state. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, speaking in Jerusalem to the presidents of Jewish organizations last week, said: "The Palestinians expect us to recognize a nation state for the Palestinian people. How do they have the temerity not to recognize the Jewish state, the nation state of the Jewish people?"

Of course, the Palestinians have recognized the state of Israel during negotiations under prime ministers Yitzhak Rabin, Ehud Barak and Ehud Olmert, in which both sides recognized the legitimacy and aspirations of the other. For what other purpose were Rabin and Yasser Arafat shaking hands on the White House lawn? Palestinians claim that to recognize Israel as a Jewish state dehumanizes the more than 1 million Arab Israelis, as well as Christians and other minorities, who are counted as citizens of Israel. Netanyahu may have erected this demand to block any return to the negotiating table.

But for those interested in moving forward, it seems a worthy exercise to try to satisfy this requirement.

The Israeli-Palestinian conflict is not the first or the most intractable faced by Western diplomacy. In 1972, the question of Taiwan stood in the way of a Sino-American rapprochement. But President Nixon overcame the towering enmities between the Chinese civil war rivals — Mao Tse-tung and Chiang Kai-shek — who had fought to a standstill over who should rule China and whose armies still faced each other across the narrow Taiwan Strait.

In that negotiation, as in the Holy Land today, there was a fierce battle over definitions. Mao's mainland government insisted on stating that "the People's Republic of China is the sole legal government of China… [and] the liberation of Taiwan is China's internal affair."

But the able diplomats on the U.S. negotiating team proposed language for a joint Washington-Beijing declaration that became the operative component of what we call the Shanghai Communique: "The U.S. acknowledges that all Chinese on either side of the Taiwan Strait maintain there is but one China."

Following this declaration in February 1972, all sides eventually agreed to defer the core issues of the conflict so as to begin a dialogue on how they might one day come together, opening the lines of communication, trade and investment across the strait, all of which has been knitting the Chinese people back together in a web of constructive interaction. There are still many problems across the strait, but Nixon's achievement, enabled by creative diplomacy, opened a new chapter in Asia.

For Israelis and Palestinians, a version of the Shanghai formula, orchestrated by the U.S. and other Western nations, could address Netanyahu's concerns by allowing him and his Palestinian partner, Mahmoud Abbas, to state their views of history, while adhering to these truths: that both sides agree there is one Israel and one Palestine; that Israel is the national homeland for the Jewish people, and for the indigenous Arabs, Christians and other minorities who count as its citizens; that Palestine is the national homeland of the Palestinian people, including Arabs, Christians and others who will be its citizens.

Further, Israelis recognize the Palestinian state with the understanding that it is the right of its citizens to define its national character. Likewise, Palestinians recognize the state of Israel and that it is for the Israelis to define their national character. Neither side should interfere in the internal affairs of the other in this process.

Netanyahu may not fully agree with such a formulation, but the task of creative diplomats will be to find the means for political expression with which each leader can defend the historical narrative and definitions of domestic constituencies.

The genius of the Shanghai Communique was that it deferred the red-hot issues of war and legitimacy to an unspecified future. Taiwan initially denounced the document as an American sellout and a surrender to "Red" China. But its leaders came around to the wisdom of engaging its mainland rival on trade, commerce and investment as long as the U.S. guaranteed the island's security by selling Taiwan defensive arms.

Deferral is the key ingredient for Middle East peace. Let both sides recognize each other as states, and leave the full expression of national character and the future to its citizens, where it belongs.

Patrick Tyler, a journalist, is the author of "A Great Wall," a history of U.S.-China relations; "A World of Trouble," a history of U.S. diplomacy in the Middle East; and "Fortress Israel."

Copyright © 2015, Los Angeles Times
Related Content
  • Supreme Court gets it right on Jerusalem passport case

    Supreme Court gets it right on Jerusalem passport case

    The Supreme Court on Monday handed President Obama — and his successors — a significant and deserved victory when it ruled that recognizing a foreign government is the "exclusive" province of the executive branch. By a 6-3 vote, the justices struck down a provision in a law passed by Congress in...

  • Divided on Jerusalem

    Divided on Jerusalem

    On Monday, the U.S. Supreme Court sided with the Obama administration in a case involving a Jerusalem-born boy and his parents who wanted to take advantage of a 2002 law that allows Israel to be listed as the country of birth on the passport of a child born in Jerusalem. In 2011, when the high...

  • They're Palestinians, not 'Israeli Arabs'

    They're Palestinians, not 'Israeli Arabs'

    Can you imagine reading an editorial in a respected newspaper today discussing the rights of "Negroes" or "Chinamen"? Probably not. And yet, like other newspapers in this country, The Times continues to use the generic term "Arabs" or "Israeli Arabs" to refer to the Palestinians who live inside...

  • Netanyahu's remarks on Israel's Arab citizens part of a disturbing conversation

    Netanyahu's remarks on Israel's Arab citizens part of a disturbing conversation

    Under pressure from around the world, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu apologized Monday for his last-minute campaign diatribe in which he declared ominously that the Arab citizens of Israel were being bused to the polls “en masse” and were “distorting” the election by simply exercising...

  • Benjamin Netanyahu's speech to Congress comes at right time, right place

    Benjamin Netanyahu's speech to Congress comes at right time, right place

    Imagine for a moment that your neighbor down the street was engaged in some basement science that could level your house and even kill you, if he so desired. Your best friend, who happens to live some distance away, out of harm's reach, can end the threat to your life and property but is now trying...

  • Putting Israel's name back on the map

    Putting Israel's name back on the map

    Mapping the world is not as easy as it seems. Border disputes make it difficult to draw national boundaries that everyone can agree on. Countries come and go over time and maps must be redrawn, even reconceived. When Crimea is annexed by Russia or the West Bank is occupied by Israel, when Japan...

  • The Palestinians' decision to join the ICC deserves support

    The Palestinians' decision to join the ICC deserves support

    The Israel exception to Western governments' human rights principles has been starkly on display in the reaction to the Palestinian Authority's decision to join the International Criminal Court. In Washington, Ottawa, Paris and London, as well as Tel Aviv, the response has ranged from discouraging...

  • The Israel boycott that backfired

    The Israel boycott that backfired

    For about a year, the American Studies Assn. has been offering a very public object lesson in how to destroy a scholarly organization. Ostensibly devoted to the study of all things American, the 5,000-member academic cohort has ventured outside its natural borders and into the crossfire of Israeli-Palestinian...