OpinionOpinion L.A.
Opinion

Are Supt. John Deasy's days numbered? They should be after cozy iPad deal

John DeasyLos Angeles Unified School DistrictComputer HardwareApple iPadCalifornia Public Records ActLos Angeles Board of Education
Right out of the gate, it became clear that there were problems with LAUSD's $1-billion iPad contract
LAUSD bought iPads at full cost even though the model was about to be replaced by a newer version
LAUSD's Supt. John Deasy got a little too cozy with Apple execs

It sounded like a great idea at the time: L.A. would give students a boost into the 21st century by putting tech directly into their hands. The Los Angeles Unified School District would buy an Apple iPad for every student,  more than 600,000,  each loaded with educational software supplied by Pearson, a major education services company. 

"In June 2013, the [Los Angeles] Board of Education approved a deal with the Apple/Pearson team after senior staff assured members that its proposal was both the least expensive and highest in quality, Pearson provided curriculum; Apple was to supply iPads," Howard Blume writes in The Times.

Apple's sleek tablets appeared in 47 Los Angeles public schools during the 2013-14 academic year. Right out of the gate, however, it became clear that there were problems with the $1-billion contract. At a time when the district had been through years of drastic budget cuts and brutal teacher layoffs, Apple charged L.A. more per device than other districts had paid. Pearson's software was glitchy and incomplete. Schools weren't set up to deal with security concerns -- protecting the hardware and blocking students from viewing inappropriate Internet content proved difficult.

The district bought iPads at full cost even though the model was about to be replaced by a newer version. "Students at three campuses, for example, deleted security filters so they could browse the Internet — prompting officials to prohibit the use of the devices outside school. At times, officials also provided conflicting or incorrect answers about the project to a technology committee headed by school board member Monica Ratliff," according to The Times.

When government bureaucracies wind up paying too much money to private contractors for goods and services that fall short -- especially when the deal gets cut quickly -- it's reasonable to wonder whether the bidding process was open and transparent. Based on a series of emails disclosed at the request of The Times under the California Public Records Act, communications between L.A. schools Supt. John Deasy and executives at Pearson and Apple -- as well as the complaints of rivals who tried to land the district's business -- appear to indicate that an arm's-length approach gave way to a level of institutional coziness that could be a conflict of interest, or at best, gives the appearance of a conflict of interest. 

"It looked like Apple was positioned to be the choice," Chiara Tellini of Irvine-based Mind Research Institute, a company with competing curriculum to Pearson, said  to Blume.

From Blume's report:

“In one email, from May 24, 2012, then-Deputy Supt. Jaime Aquino seems to strategize with higher-ups from Pearson, an international education-services company, on how to ensure that it got the job.

" ‘I believe we would have to make sure that your bid is the lowest one,’  wrote Aquino, who was an executive with a Pearson affiliate before joining L.A. Unified.

“Deasy was one of the last to participate in that email exchange and made his comments after Aquino's, which covered several topics.

" ‘Understand your points and we need to work together on this quickly,’  Deasy wrote. ‘I want to not loose [sic] an amazing opportunity and fully recognize our current limits.’"

Charming.

Blume continues, "On Sunday, Deasy said that the conversations were only about a 'pilot program we did at several schools months before we decided to do a large-scale implementation. We did work closely on this pilot.'"

Under fire and perhaps an ethics probe, L.A. Unified has suspended the Apple/Pearson deal.

"You should make every bidder think they have a slim chance of getting the job," Stuart Magruder, a school bond oversight committee member who questioned the deal at the time and got fired over it only to be later reinstated, told Times columnist Steve Lopez. Deasy " ‘didn't do that,’" said Magruder.  Lopez is not alone in wondering aloud whether Deasy's days at L.A. Unified are numbered.

If not, they ought to be. In politics as in business, there's little effective difference between the appearance of impropriety and corruption. Taxpayers have the right not to have to wonder whether their money is being safeguarded — and students have the right not to know they're being shortchanged by a regime heavy on high tech and low on actual teaching.

Follow Ted Rall on Twitter @tedrall

Copyright © 2014, Los Angeles Times
Related Content
John DeasyLos Angeles Unified School DistrictComputer HardwareApple iPadCalifornia Public Records ActLos Angeles Board of Education
  • Can Supt. Deasy survive LAUSD's iPad fiasco?
    Can Supt. Deasy survive LAUSD's iPad fiasco?

    So, remember that $1-billion plan to get iPads for each and every Los Angeles Unified student the district has been working on and steadfastly defending for a couple of years now?

  • Will Secure Communities work for immigration enforcement?
    Will Secure Communities work for immigration enforcement?

    The federal government's Secure Communities program has been as controversial as it has been counterproductive, so we're glad the Obama administration's new approach to immigration enforcement will mean the program's demise. Yet we also harbor some skepticism about its successor, the Priority...

  • Assemblyman Raul Bocanegra lost focus, and reelection
    Assemblyman Raul Bocanegra lost focus, and reelection

    With so much focus on who's raising the most money, who's got the big-name endorsements and who's got labor or business or whatever special interests' backing, it's easy to overlook the simple fact that elections are decided by individual voters. Money, political connections and even incumbency...

  • Why do people cross the border illegally? It's not what you think
    Why do people cross the border illegally? It's not what you think

    President Obama's executive order on immigration will affect the lives of millions of undocumented immigrants — perhaps as profoundly as their illegal crossing into the U.S. did in the first place. It's been a divisive action about people some Americans regard as criminals. Yet what...

  • GOP ponders its next move in wake of Obama's immigration action
    GOP ponders its next move in wake of Obama's immigration action

    When President Obama announced his decision to allow roughly 4 million undocumented immigrants to stay in the U.S. without fear of deportation, Democrats and Republicans in Washington disagreed furiously about the move. No surprise there.

  • Retailers are waging a war on Thanksgiving
    Retailers are waging a war on Thanksgiving

    There has been a lot of talk over the years about whether there's a war on Christmas. That's debatable. But there is definitely a pernicious and obvious war on another holiday: Thanksgiving. Every year, retailers greedily eat up more of the holiday and come a little closer to turning...

  • The real-life Bill Cosby show: Follow the sanctimony
    The real-life Bill Cosby show: Follow the sanctimony

    The phrase "follow the money" was popularized in the Watergate docudrama "All the President's Men."

  • Kinkisharyo and IBEW win; CEQA loses?
    Kinkisharyo and IBEW win; CEQA loses?

    When Mayor Eric Garcetti announced the deal he had helped broker between Japanese light-rail manufacturer Kinkisharyo International and the electrical workers union, it was a win for the economy in Los Angeles County. But for environmentalists? Not so much.

Comments
Loading