To the editor: Billionaire
A person's education is informal (home and community) and formal (school). Experts tell us that a child's scholastic achievement, as measured by a standardized test, reflects mostly the child's socioeconomic background. For this reason, an emphasis on schooling alone would show little improvement in a child's education.
Broad is now concentrating on charter schools. But if you take a few students and improve education for them, does that mean you've improved "urban education," or have you just improved it for a few students?
We know that academic achievement correlates closely with home circumstances. Instead of putting the entire burden of education on the school, perhaps it's time to respond to the research.
Linda Mele Johnson, Long Beach
To the editor: We should not take issue with Broad's decision to suspend prizes for urban school systems. Providing financial incentives for many urban schools reflects a misunderstanding of the reasons for much of their substandard academic performance.
If Broad wishes to truly influence educational reform in urban areas, he may want to have his staff look into addressing the causes of severe poverty that affect the school performance of so many urban school students and their families.
Stu Bernstein, Santa Monica