Opinion Readers React
Readers React

The incredible, job-creating drone

To the editor: The Times makes a clear case for the many benefits of unmanned aircraft systems in California, from fighting wildfires to growing grapes, studying the environment to saving lives. However, it makes recommendations that could chill the growth and potential of this technology. ("State Senate should approve proposed drone regulations," Editorial, July 28)

Privacy is an important issue, and as such, any new privacy laws should focus on the real issue at hand: the collection and storage of data, not the platform doing the collecting. The focus on privacy laws for specific platforms is misguided, and at the same time it would likely curb innovation.

As The Times says, the beneficial applications of unmanned aircraft systems abound. Meanwhile, the Assn. of Unmanned Vehicle Systems International estimates that UAS integration could create more than 18,000 jobs in California.

Legislators should be cautious about passing restrictive regulations that could deny us the societal or economic benefits of this promising technology.

Matthew Sanford, San Diego

The writer is manager of economic development at the San Diego Regional Economic Development Corp.


To the editor: Thousands of years ago in Sumeria, the great epic story of the flood began with the gods deciding to punish human beings because their civilization was too noisy. We have arrived again at the same place, where our society batters our senses every waking moment. Now drones in the skies, some as small as hummingbirds, will assault us as we try to find any tranquil spot.

Who has made the momentous decision to allow this new pollution? It originated with military research and practice, was adopted without a citizens referendum by industry and the police, and has been vetted by a judge or two. Now The Times is complicit in one more imposition of technology on a supposedly free citizenry.

Not so fast. I, for one, prefer real hummingbirds.

Jean E. Rosenfeld, Los Angeles

Copyright © 2014, Los Angeles Times
Related Content
  • State Senate should approve proposed drone regulations
    State Senate should approve proposed drone regulations

    The use of drones could revolutionize business, government and law enforcement. Imagine, for example, small unmanned aircraft flying low to the ground to deliver precise measures of pesticides to agricultural fields, reducing the amount of dangerous chemicals used. Drones already have proved...

  • Sony pulls 'The Interview': Some sympathy for North Korea
    Sony pulls 'The Interview': Some sympathy for North Korea

    North Korea's despotic regime is arguably the world's most brutal. It enriches dynastic leader Kim Jong Un and his political elite while the people who revere him as a god-king face deadly food shortages, a total lack of freedom and the ever-present threat of dying in one of the country's...

  • Sony hack reveals the ugly side of Hollywood
    Sony hack reveals the ugly side of Hollywood

    To the editor: The purpose of the mysterious cyberattack on Sony Pictures has been obvious from the beginning. It was done mainly to humiliate executives and expose the entertainment business for what it is: an elitist group of egomaniacs. ("Sony calls on media to stop publishing hacked...

  • Re-thinking how we talk about California's drought

    To the editor: George Skelton rightfully harangues California officials for their framing of the water issues facing the state. ("Government is being a drip on the drought," Dec. 14)

  • L.A. must do all it can for sex-trafficking victims

    To the editor: You suggest that a john-shaming campaign by L.A. County for those caught buying and raping girls is akin to the Scarlet letters, stocks and tarring and feathering of the past. Sadly, the men you don't wish to see humiliated use those practices on our girls today: branding them...

  • Police body cameras keep everybody in check

    To the editor: Jennifer Dawn Carlson is quite right in stating that equipping police with body cameras won't be a panacea. If, as she suggests, some jurisdictions were to prohibit citizens from photographing police because of the body cameras, that would be a big mistake. ("Body cameras...

  • Why only a cross for Mt. Soledad? Why not a Star of David?

    To the editor: The religious right's crafty plan to keep a huge Christian cross prominently displayed within government property likely won't end a quarter-century of legal feuding. An unquestionably constitutional resolution of this controversy should be considered. ("Senate passes bill that...

  • Torture is wrong: Readers agree, even if most Americans might not
    Torture is wrong: Readers agree, even if most Americans might not

    File this one under "Depressing Polls": A survey conducted by the Pew Research Center shows that on the question of whether torture (or, in CIA speak, enhanced interrogation) is morally acceptable or effective, most Americans fall somewhere between "not sure" and "of...