Column: Political Road Map: If you think it’s time to rein in money in politics, look to Sacramento or to California’s voters
If there’s any lesson Ann Ravel could take away from her time in Washington spent watching the big money of political campaigns, perhaps it’s this: If you want something done right, do it yourself.
And so when it comes to shining a brighter light on some of the more mysterious money in politics, Ravel sees no sense in waiting for action from the nation’s capital.
“We’re going to have to look to the states,” said Ravel, who last weekend resigned her seat on the Federal Election Commission and is on her way back home to California.
Ravel rode a fast rocket to the top of the campaign finance world, having never worked on the subject before Gov. Jerry Brown selected her in 2011 to chair the state’s Fair Political Practices Commission. Two years later, President Obama appointed her to the FEC.
What she found was a federal agency in a partisan standoff when it came to overseeing how billions of dollars are spent on campaigns — or even whether it should play any role at all. It’s why Ravel, who will teach at UC Berkeley’s law school this fall, said it may now be time for homegrown action.
Political Road Map: Campaign spending on California ballot measures broke a record in 2016 »
“States are now realizing that they need their own laws,” she said in an interview last week.
Some believe California is ahead of the curve, with rules put in place during Ravel’s tenure in Sacramento. Those rules were prompted by a case in which $11 million was funneled through a network of nonprofit organizations into a political action committee deeply involved in two 2012 ballot initiative campaigns. In 2015, the FPPC added additional regulations surrounding disclosure of donors whose money passes through nonprofit groups.
Efforts like that are more likely to survive legal challenges, UC Irvine law professor Rick Hasen points out.
“What the Supreme Court has done in disclosure is give a wide berth to the states,” he said. “I think there’s a lot that can be done.”
State legislators, who have wrestled with disclosure bills several times in recent years, will again consider this spring an effort to force additional disclosure in funding of campaign advertisements.
There’s also an opportunity for voters to impose more transparency through California’s ballot initiative process. That’s how the state’s landmark 1974 political reform law was enacted, one that’s in the process of being updated by campaign finance officials.
What’s less likely to stand in the courts are new attempts to rein in the outsize role of contributions to independent political action committees. The U.S. Supreme Court ruling in the 2010 Citizens United case remains intact.
Still, Ravel wonders whether several states, all offering slightly different rules, might thwart any additional one-size-fits-all rulings on campaign money. Hasen is less optimistic.
“I don’t believe that states will have that much maneuvering room” on setting new contribution limits, he said. “Laws have been struck down for everything but disclosure. I expect that trajectory will continue.”
The only other option may be more public financing, where some models have survived court challenges. Gov. Jerry Brown signed a law last year allowing additional cities and counties in the state to use taxpayer dollars for political campaigns.
Ravel, for one, says she’ll keep at it when it comes to connecting the dots between who’s giving and getting campaign cash. She hasn’t decided how to stay involved after leaving the FEC, but said the issue is too important to abandon.
“I care a lot not just about campaign finance, but about its impact on civic engagement and people’s trust in government,” she said.
Follow @johnmyers on Twitter, sign up for our daily Essential Politics newsletter and listen to the weekly California Politics Podcast
ALSO:
California’s secretary of state loses an effort to rebut Trump’s voter fraud accusations
Political Road Map: Does California spend more money on schools or prisons?
Get the L.A. Times Politics newsletter
Deeply reported insights into legislation, politics and policy from Sacramento, Washington and beyond. In your inbox three times per week.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.
