But don't start popping the Champagne corks for full-figure acceptance just yet. Graham isn't actually being featured in the magazine's editorial coverage -- the annual lineup of lithe ladies that has, over the years, included the barely clad likes of Cheryl Tiegs,
For that reason alone we have a hard time seeing it as the kind of "ground-breaking," "first-ever" or "historic" occasion the Internet is currently abuzz with over the ad. We'll break out the bubbly when models like Graham finally smash through that sand ceiling and are allowed to frolic in the surf of the magazine's editorial pages. In the meantime, we're giving Swimsuitsforall -- and its PR machine - mad props for the spin.
And if even a fraction of the fellows flipping through the issue mistake her for just another one of the annual issue's bikini-clad babes, we'll consider that one step closer to kicking the "plus-size" qualifier to the curb altogether.
And really, when you think about it, when the average American woman wears a size 14 dress, aren't the rest of those models technically "minus-size"?