Opinion Opinion L.A.
Opinion

Can the swastika be rehabilitated? In a word, no

A fashion designer thinks he can rehabilitate the swastika
Nazi Party's swastika had an earlier, benign significance
Is the swastika a victim of guilt by association?

The Atlantic has an article about a fashion designer who wants to take the stigma out of the swastika. I’m tempted to limit my comment on that idea to a sarcastic “Good luck with that.” But the proposed rehabilitation of the swastika -- a symbol with positive connotations in some cultures -- raises an interesting question. Can a symbol be so tainted by an association with evil that it can never be reinterpreted?

The Atlantic reports:

“Today, there are those who would like to highlight and make use of the swastika’s original meaning. Among them is artist and designer Sinjun Wessin, whose Spiritual Punx line of clothing, accessories and stickers -- which started in 2013 and is designed to ‘inspire people to be more loving and accepting to all’ -- treats the 'swasi' as a feel-good icon. …

"'If the hate is taken away from the symbol by energizing its positive side, then we take away power from the people who want to use it in a hateful way,' Wessin says. 'If we don't do anything and just leave it as negative, then we still let hate win.'"

Wessin stressed that his designs employed "ancient positive versions" of the swastika, not the Nazi version.

Wessin isn’t the first person to try to purge the swastika of its associations with the Nazi regime and its unspeakable cruelties. There long has been a movement to rediscover the swastika’s benign, pre-Hitler symbolism. As a BBC article notes: “The word is derived from the Sanskrit 'svastika' and means 'good to be.' In Indo-European culture, it was a mark made on people or objects to give them good luck.”

My first encounter with swastika revisionism was when some college friends and I toured the Carlsberg brewery in Copenhagen in the 1970s.  At the brewery’s gateway was a statute of an elephant whose saddle blankets were ornamented with -- you guessed it.

It turned out that the swastika had served as a logo for the brewery until, as our elderly guide put it, Hitler “took this beautiful symbol and ruined it.” We were aghast. (On a recent return visit to the brewery -- which has been turned into a beer museum -- I noticed that exhibits of the company’s early advertising were accompanied by a rather cryptic explanation about why the swastika had been retired.)

I’m no semiotician, but I know that symbols can have many meanings. Still, like the burning cross, the swastika is so freighted with negative associations that reinterpretation seems a quixotic enterprise. Its appearance is unsettling even when it's clear that no endorsement of Nazism is intended.

Last year, NBC aired a live production of “The Sound of Music” and critics and viewers alike cringed when the Von Trapp family performed in front of (historically accurate) swastika banners. In 2005, Prince Harry scandalized Britons -- not all of them World War II veterans -- when he sported the symbol on an armband as part of his costume-party impersonation of an Afrika Korps officer.

In some parallel universe, it might be possible to “energize the positive side” of the swastika, but not this one. Our brewery tour guide was right: Hitler ruined it. Forever. 

Follow Michael McGough on Twitter @MichaelMcGough3.

Copyright © 2014, Los Angeles Times
Related Content
  • It's beginning to look a lot like 24 hours of freedom
    It's beginning to look a lot like 24 hours of freedom

    I have a long and complicated history with Christmas. Most Jews do. As a kid, I felt the pangs of being shunned by Santa. I yearned to climb onto his lap at the department store and tell him my darkest consumer desires, but my mother always said no.

  • Blame game in N.Y. cop killings shows demonization double standard
    Blame game in N.Y. cop killings shows demonization double standard

    Going by objective standards of reason and fairness, Al Sharpton is not to blame for the assassination of two New York City cops over the weekend. Nor are New York Mayor Bill de Blasio, U.S. Atty. Gen. Eric H. Holder Jr., President Obama or any of the protesters and activists they supported,...

  • Putting a lid on methane from cattle
    Putting a lid on methane from cattle

    The $1.1-trillion omnibus spending bill signed by President Obama contains many giveaways to Wall Street, casinos and the coal industry. But the ones that might do the most severe damage long-term have to do with, of all things, the digestive systems of cattle.

  • Protesters didn't cause slayings of New York police officers
    Protesters didn't cause slayings of New York police officers

    Without sufficient thought and care, the nation could too easily allow the cruel ambush killings Saturday of two New York City police officers to undermine the often tense but crucial national dialogue on race and policing that was spurred by the deaths of African American suspects earlier this...

  • What to do when you're Jewish and your children love Christmas
    What to do when you're Jewish and your children love Christmas

    In today’s installment of “op-eds from Christmas past,” we revisit Dinah Lenney’s 2010 op-ed, “Coming to terms with Christmas” In it, Lenney, who is Jewish, talks about how she celebrates the holidays with her children.

  • Soy to the World: Does Santa prefer soy milk or dairy?
    Soy to the World: Does Santa prefer soy milk or dairy?

    People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals wants families to leave soy milk out for Santa this year with the cookies, instead of cow's milk, saying that the use of dairy contributes to the suffering of cows. (And yes, the organization wants vegan cookies, none of this butter stuff.)

Comments
Loading