No pitcher ever has signed for more. Despite the local love for Kershaw, some thought it a tad excessive.
Only now comes word
Which in no way is meant to disparage Scherzer, who clearly is one of baseball's best starting pitchers. It's just that it's simple to argue Kershaw is the best.
Their careers are pretty easy to compare. Both made their major league debuts in 2008. Kershaw has appeared in 211 games, Scherzer in 209. Their numbers:
Scherzer –- 91-50, 3.58 earned-run average, 1.22 walks plus hits per inning pitched, 9.6 strikeouts per nine innings.
Kershaw –- 98-49, 2.48 ERA, 1.06 WHIP, 9.4 strikeouts per nine innings.
Granted this is like comparing a Lamborghini with a Ferrari, but the edge in ERA and WHIP clearly goes to Kershaw. He’s also earned three
Factor all that in, and Kershaw's deal now looks pretty good.
Even if they were exactly the same pitcher, would you rather spend $220 million on a player who turns 27 in March or one who turns 31 in July?
Certainly Kershaw’s signing last year helped Scherzer to his contract, just as any record deal lifts the water for those who follow. But no one is claiming Albert Pujols is a deal for the Angels. Kershaw is looking good for the Dodgers. And next year