Advertisement

Methane seepage at Aliso Canyon poses no risk, gas company says

Edie Pistolesi, left, protests with other supporters and Porter Ranch residents outside SoCal Gas in Chatsworth to oppose the construction of new gas turbines at the Aliso Canyon gas storage facility, the site of a gas leak last year that displaced thousand of residents.
Edie Pistolesi, left, protests with other supporters and Porter Ranch residents outside SoCal Gas in Chatsworth to oppose the construction of new gas turbines at the Aliso Canyon gas storage facility, the site of a gas leak last year that displaced thousand of residents.
(Mel Melcon / Los Angeles Times)
Share

Southern California Gas Co. has detected methane gas seepage near the massive Aliso Canyon underground gas field, but a spokesman said the “very, very small amount” is odorless and poses no health hazard to residents.

The seepage, which gas company spokesman Chris Gilbride described as the equivalent of “the wisping vapors of a single table candle,” is believed to consist of residual traces of methane trapped in the soil and released by the weekend’s heavy rain, he said.

The seepage was first detected by infrared cameras on Saturday, and continued intermittently through Monday.

Advertisement

The release is a mile from homes, and has not affected overall methane levels. It poses no risk of environmental damage, Gilbride said.

Interested in the stories shaping California? Sign up for the free Essential California newsletter »

A major leak that was detected at the site in October 2015 and lasted until February became the largest recorded methane release in U.S. history, prompting thousands of nearby Porter Ranch residents to leave their homes as officials struggled to cap a faulty well.

Residents complained of headaches, nosebleeds and nausea, short-term symptoms associated with an odor-causing additive in the natural gas.

Southern California Gas Co. agreed in September to pay $4 million to settle criminal charges over its failure to notify authorities of the massive leak, but still faces potentially costly civil lawsuits from residents and regulators.

Gilbride said the utility notified regulators, local elected officials, a community advisory board and its database of 60,000 residents about the seepage as part of a “robust” communications plan set up after the leak.

Advertisement

gholland@latimes.com

Follow me for homelessness news on Twitter: @geholland

MORE LOCAL NEWS

At nightclubs, ‘legs contests’ bare a bit more. Just don’t ask a lot of questions

Coroner’s officials identify man shot and killed by deputies in Pico Rivera

Should grizzly bears be brought back into the Sierra Nevada?

Advertisement
Advertisement