Bell Corruption Trial Ends With Alleged Juror Threats, Misconduct

The Bell corruption trial came to a chaotic end Thursday as the judge declared a mistrial on the outstanding counts, saying "all hell has broken loose" with the deeply divided jury.

An exasperated Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Kathleen Kennedy drew the case to a close after a bizarre day in which one juror asked to reconsider the guilty verdicts reached Wednesday. Then, an anonymous juror passed a note to Kennedy urging her to "remind the jury to remain respectful and not to make false accusations and insults to one another." Kennedy refused to set aside the guilty verdicts.

The jurors asked to be escorted out of the courthouse by sheriff's deputies without speaking to reporters.

FULL COVERAGE: Crisis in Bell

But in an interview later with The Times, one juror said dissension on the jury worsened considerably in the last week.

"We had some jurors who just kind of didn't care what the instructions were and what the judge said and that was just that," said the woman, who asked to remain anonymous and said she was in favor of guilt.

The woman said it was time to end deliberations.

"It was very, very tense, and I believe that if we hadn't ended when we did it probably could have been a lot worse," she said. "I believe that [the defendants] were good people but that wasn't what we were there to decide, I was doing my best to base everything on the evidence and the facts of the case."

Even defense attorneys were stunned by the turn of events in the downtown Los Angeles courtroom.

"The verdicts came out and then it got weird," said Stanley L. Friedman, who represents one of the accused former city leaders.

At one point, a juror inquired about Bell's former city attorney, Edward Lee, who was not charged in the sweeping corruption probe and didn't testify during the trial. The juror wrote to Kennedy that knowing more about Lee would help the panel in deliberations and be "certain beyond a reasonable doubt."

VIDEO DISCUSSION: Bell trial comes to bizarre end

Jurors spent 17 days behind closed doors before convicting Victor Bello, George Cole, Oscar Hernandez, Teresa Jacobo and George Mirabal of driving up their salaries by serving on government boards that prosecutors said rarely met and, in one case, may have been invented as a device to push their paychecks even higher.

The panel of seven women and five men acquitted the defendants on some charges and were unable to reach a verdict on the remaining charges. Luis Artiga, a pastor, was exonerated on all counts.

There were indications early on that the jury was fractured. A few days into deliberations, one juror was removed for alleged misconduct. In the end, deliberations took nearly as long as the trial itself.

Legal experts say the jury's behavior was extremely unusual.

"I have never heard of anything like this in my 40 years of law," said Robert Sheahen, a veteran Los Angeles criminal defense attorney. "To go back and ask to reexamine verdicts doesn't happen."

Gerald F. Uelmen, a Santa Clara University School of Law criminal law professor, said that the jury problems could help the defense in a challenge but that Kennedy was correct in refusing to set aside the Wednesday verdicts.

"They will be looking to see if there was any coercion and will probably file motions for a new trial," he said. "But the bottom line is the jury reached its decision."

Prosecutors declined to comment because of the upcoming trial of Robert Rizzo, the former city administrator alleged to be the mastermind of the corruption. But an official said no decision has been made about retrying the defendants on the remaining charges.