Brown also made clear that he has concerns with the $11.1-billion bond currently set to go before voters in November, according to people familiar with the conversations. That bond, originally written in 2009, would direct $3 billion for storage projects. But opposition from Brown could seriously harm its prospects if it remained on the ballot.
According to legislative sources, Brown indicated he would want one-third of the bond--$2 billion--for water storage.
Lawmakers have been floating a number of proposals to replace the current bond. One $10.5-billion proposal by Sen.
Senate President Pro Tem
"I would describe it as progress," Steinberg said. "We were talking about the big picture."
Steinberg said that despite the stalled vote on Monday, the debate on the Wolk bond "energized the conversation."
Now, in 24 hours, we're making progress," he said.
The governor's office declined to comment on the details emerging Tuesday. Spokesman Jim Evans said that regarding the size of the bond, "the governor is concerned about ongoing debt service and its impact on future budgets."
The Legislature needs some Republican support to provide the two-thirds vote needed to put a new water bond on the November ballot to replace an $11.1-billion measure already there but that supporters fear will not win voter support.
In addition to meeting with Democratic legislative leaders, Brown also had discussions Tuesday with Senate GOP leader
On Tuesday, a spokesman for Huff confirmed that Republicans were willing to negotiate.
"We appreciate the governor's direct engagement in this process, as he's been silent until now," said spokesman Peter DeMarco. "All parties understand that time is short and discussions are ongoing; we believe a solution can be found that meets California's immediate and long-term needs."
The $10.5-billion bond proposed by Wolk "abandoned the statewide approach to improving water management," DeMarco said.