Water agency approves farmers’ voluntary water reduction plan

Gino Celli draws a water sample to check the salinity in an irrigation canal that runs through his fields near Stockton. Celli farms 1,500 acres of land and manages an additional 7,000 acres, has senior water rights and draws his irrigation water from the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta.

Gino Celli draws a water sample to check the salinity in an irrigation canal that runs through his fields near Stockton. Celli farms 1,500 acres of land and manages an additional 7,000 acres, has senior water rights and draws his irrigation water from the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta.

(Rich Pedroncelli / Associated Press)

In a move reflecting the growing severity of California’s drought, state water regulators have accepted a historic proposal by Delta region farmers to voluntarily cut water usage by 25%, or, alternatively, to allow a quarter of their fields to lay idle.

The action follows a move by Gov. Jerry Brown to cut urban water use by 25% — an emergency measure that has caused no small amount of resentment among many residents who claim agriculture is not doing its share to conserve water.

Under an agreement with growers in the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta, the hub of the state’s water system, the state will allow farmers with some of the oldest and most secure water rights to voluntarily reduce usage by 25%.


“These are senior-water-rights holders stepping up to say they’ll do their part,” said Felicia Marcus, chairwoman of the State Water Resources Control Board, which announced the deal Friday.

The action applies only to so-called riparian rights holders, landowners whose property has direct access to a river or stream. By volunteering the cuts, Delta farmers avoid the risk of being hit with even larger cutbacks mandated by state water regulators.

The Delta region represents less than 10% of the state’s total 6.9-billion acres of farmland, yet some see Friday’s action as a foreshadowing of new limits on agricultural water use statewide. Regulators have suggested that such cuts are a near certainty, but say that cool, overcast weather, as well as recent rainfall, have allowed them to delay action.

The Delta farmers’ proposal was particularly welcome as it seemed to remove the threat of lengthy and divisive litigation in a time of crisis.

“It allows participating growers to share in the sacrifice that people throughout the state are facing because of the severe drought, while protecting their economic well-being by giving them some certainty,” Marcus said.

Marcus noted that these riparian-rights holders have “heretofore not had to participate in drought response.”


The right of these growers to divert water directly from a stream or river dates back more than 100 years and has never before been challenged. However, as the state enters a fourth year of drought, water regulators say there is no way any one group can avoid water use restrictions.

“Curtailment of more senior water rights are virtually inevitable because there’s less water in the system than there are demands at even pretty senior-water-rights levels,” said Michael George, the state watermaster for the Delta.

In the last month, the board has ordered about 9,000 so-called junior rights holders in the Sacramento and San Joaquin river basins to stop pumping from rivers and streams this summer. These junior rights holders have claims that date back only as far as 1914.

The board is also expected to impose cuts on some senior rights holders in the San Joaquin River watershed, who have claims that date back to before 1914.

The plan approved Friday was offered by growers, and is one of a number of proposals the water board is considering.

“There’s lots of creative discussion going on; there’s also a lot of litigation swords being rattled,” George said. “It’s a trying time for everybody.”

Since the plan is voluntary, it remains unclear how many farmers will participate and what amount of water may be saved.

George Hartmann, a Stockton-based attorney who helped devise the plan on behalf of growers, said it could potentially save about 225,000 acre-feet of water if all eligible growers participated. However, water board officials said they weren’t about to make a prediction.

“It’s perilous to hazard a guess right now,” Marcus said.

Under the plan, growers must submit online applications to the water board by June 1, and outline how they will reduce water usage relative to their 2013 levels. If approved, the voluntary restrictions will remain in place through September, ending Oct. 1.

George said there would be a number of ways the water board could verify compliance. If farmers chose the option of idling 25% of their land, satellite imagery would confirm this. Spot checks and peer pressure would, hopefully, ensure that farmers kept their promise to reduce water diversion.

“I can tell you there is a strong ethic and interest within the Delta to make sure that there’s no cheating here so that this program accomplishes its objectives,” George said.

The current drought is one of the most punishing in modern history. Irrigation deliveries have been slashed, forcing growers to idle more than 400,000 acres of cropland last year. Groundwater levels in some parts of the San Joaquin Valley have plunged to record lows as farmers drill more and deeper wells. Some small communities dependent on local sources have run out of water.

The levels of major reservoirs in Northern California are higher than they were a year ago. But the mountain snowpack that in a normal year provides the state with about a third of its water supply hit a record low on April 1.

Delta growers who do not volunteer to reduce water use will face a potential risk of heavier, government-mandated cutbacks, although water board officials said the risk of curtailment would not have been any greater if the plan had not been approved.

Technically, growers who volunteer for the program still are subject to any water board-imposed restrictions. However, Marcus said that the board would use its “enforcement discretion” to honor the voluntary reductions.

The plan’s approval was greeted warmly by conservationists.

“It is a sign that creative solutions to the drought are possible and that everyone must make sacrifices, whether it’s cutting back on watering our yards or laying some crops fallow,” said Brian Stranko, director of the Nature Conservancy’s water program.

Twitter: @montemorin