CHP Wife to Fight Liquor-License Ban

Sherri Maxfeldt operates the Stagecoach restaurant in the small north San Diego County community of Valley Center. She also sells beer and wine at the 54-seat diner. But the state says she’s breaking the law, even though the restaurant has a liquor license.

Her transgression: She is married to a peace officer, Donald George Maxfeldt Jr., a sergeant with the California Highway Patrol.

Under state law, police officers and their spouses are barred from holding liquor licenses because officers are sometimes called upon to enforce state liquor laws, and thus could face a potential conflict of interest.

“The reason for the law is very simple,” said Pete Case, San Diego district administrator for the state Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control. “There may be times when a police officer has to police his own premises, and that could lead to conflicts.”

But Sherri Maxfeldt’s lawyer, Judith Descalso of Escondido, believes that the law is unconstitutional because it discriminates on the basis of marital status, and she plans to challenge it in court.

“Our position is she shouldn’t be denied (a license) because she’s married,” Descalso said. “What if they were just living together? Or he was her brother? We don’t think the law makes any sense.”

On Friday, Maxfeldt began what could be a long legal journey when her case was heard before Willis Mevis, an administrative law judge in San Diego. Under the law, Maxfeldt must exhaust all administrative remedies before the matter can be taken to court.

Mevis will make a recommendation on the case to Alcoholic Beverage Control headquarters in Sacramento, which will then issue a decision.

Maxfeldt’s story begins with June Knab, former owner of the Stagecoach restaurant, where Maxfeldt has worked as a hostess and waitress for almost five years. Knab wanted out of the restaurant and offered to sell it to Maxfeldt.

In October, 1984, an agreement transferring ownership to Maxfeldt was reached. The liquor license was included as part of the deal. But when Maxfeldt tried to file the necessary paper work with the Alcoholic Beverage Control, she was told last March that she could not have the license because of her husband’s job.

And the beverage control went one step further. It sought to revoke the license issued to Knab, who is still the official holder, because of what it alleged was a failure to disclose the change in ownership.

Lawyers for both Maxfeldt and Knab said at Friday’s hearing that the two women never intended to cover up the ownership transfer and that they had cooperated with Alcoholic Beverage Control officials from the start.

Descalso said that even if Knab’s liquor license is revoked, Maxfeldt will apply for a new one and contest the constitutionality of the ban on police officers’ spouses holding such licenses.

According to Case of the beverage control, neither police officers nor their spouses can hold liquor licenses nor have an ownership interest in a business that sells alcoholic beverages. There is, however, an exception.

Spouses can obtain liquor licenses if the business is outside the jurisdiction of the law enforcement-employed spouse. But this provision doesn’t help Maxfeldt, even though her husband works in Temecula in Riverside County.