Advertisement

Tracking Sirotin: a Maddening Maze

Times Staff Writer

For three years, through a labyrinth of convoluted financial records that seemed to make little sense, Dan Lang and Al Kaufer tracked the man who they believed had cheated them.

Their odyssey through Stanley S. Sirotin’s business dealings in Pasadena was confusing, and at times surreal. They learned of hidden bank accounts in Switzerland, France and England, and of offshore corporations. And eventually they began to believe that most of the money they and other investors had put into Sirotin’s three Pasadena developments never went to the projects. The money, they asserted, had been diverted to foreign bank accounts and dummy corporations and was being used by Sirotin to support his and his wife’s extravagant life style.

The state Department of Corporations and the major fraud division of the Los Angeles district attorney’s office made the same discoveries in a joint investigation of Sirotin begun two years ago.

Advertisement

And it was through Great Hall Corp., a Panamanian entity with a Paris mailing address and a Swiss bank account, that Deputy Dist. Atty. Tim Browne found part of the evidence he needed to file five felony charges of grand theft against Sirotin and his wife, Beryl, late last month, alleging that the Sirotins embezzled $3.7 million from 34 investors in one of the Pasadena projects.

Checks Most Important

Most important, Browne said in documenting the alleged embezzlements, were checks written by Beryl Sirotin and another official of Sirotin’s development company to Great Hall. In three separate transactions, $430,000 was diverted to the Panamanian company, Browne said.

And although Lang and Kaufer shared information with him, Browne said, it was finding documentation of transferred funds by subpoenaing bank records that provided the crucial evidence needed to file embezzlement charges.

Advertisement

Lang and Kaufer said that at times they were frustrated by what appeared to be a slow-moving investigation by state and local authorities. Nonetheless, they said, they are impressed that Browne amassed enough evidence to file charges.

But unraveling the Sirotin case was just as confusing to authorities as it was to Kaufer and Lang, and even more difficult, Browne said. “In court, we have to prove beyond a reasonable doubt” that Sirotin did, in fact, embezzle his investors’ funds, Browne said. “I can’t just rely on the fact that, hey, things look bad here.”

Browne: ‘Pretty Involved’

The joint investigation by Browne and the state encompassed hundreds of hours of research, volumes of bank records and fragmented financial documents that one investigator said looked like “someone put a bunch of checks into a bag and shook them all up.”

Advertisement

“This one has been pretty involved,” Browne said. “When you have a case as complicated as this, no matter what the investors allege, it takes time to piece it all together. It takes a while to go through all this stuff and make sense of it.”

Kaufer and Lang also spent hundreds of hours researching Sirotin. Poring over court records, auditor’s reports and talking with scores of Sirotin associates, both said there were times when they felt like giving up.

“At times I felt powerless,” said Lang, a stock market trader in Encino. “I spent many a weekend in the office, working on this, when I should have been evaluating market trends. I spent hours talking to people, traveling around Pasadena. It detracted from my other work.”

But unlike Lang, who said his motivation was a matter of principle as well as trying to recover his investment, Los Angeles attorney Kaufer said his prime motivation was that “I wanted my money back.”

Sirotin, 61, was one of the premier developers in Pasadena from 1978 to 1984, when he fled the country, leaving behind one bankrupt development and two other financially troubled projects. He built the Burlington Arcade, Les Bureaux and The Commons, three commercial centers in the downtown area funded mainly by private investors.

16 Limited Partnerships

In Pasadena, Sirotin, who claimed to be a successful entrepreneur with a long list of successful ventures, set up Classic Projects Corp. Through that entity, which was an umbrella company for 16 different limited partnerships, Sirotin raised millions from private investors for his three projects.

Advertisement

Beryl Sirotin, reached by telephone, said last week that she “didn’t care to discuss” the allegations.

Two additional charges of violating state corporation codes for failing to register a partnership agreement were also filed against Stanley Sirotin. And together, the seven charges give some hope to the more than 100 investors who say they invested millions with Sirotin and have never been repaid.

“You feel pretty stupid sometimes when you get into an investment and you get hurt,” said Lang. “I felt pretty stupid for what happened and I guess that I wanted to vindicate my own intelligence. And part of it was just an attitude of ‘I’m not going to let this guy get away with it.’ ”

Great Hall Role Questioned

By examining the financial records of the limited partnerships, Browne said, he found the most concrete documentation that funds designated for specific Sirotin projects had been commingled and that some went directly to Sirotin.

Sirotin claimed that Great Hall was a British concern for which he did business and to which he owed money. But, Browne said, Great Hall was in fact a vehicle through which Sirotin embezzled funds.

Another entity, Wood Lighting Industries, in Orange County, a company Sirotin purchased for his son, Daniel, received $1.4 million from Classic Projects through checks written by Sirotin, his wife and two other officials of the company, Browne said. Wood Lighting, which is no longer in business, provided no professional services to Classic Projects, or any of the partnerships, Browne said.

Advertisement

“That was pretty bold,” he said. “He was just using so many of these names. Wood Lighting was not involved in any of the projects . . . but yet it got all of this money.”

‘Still a Lot to Do’

Still, Browne said, the investigation is not complete. “There’s still a lot to do. A lot of it I cannot talk about right now. But we may be filing additional charges.”

Browne has initiated extradition proceedings against Sirotin, who lives in a hillside mansion near East Sussex in England. Such proceedings, Browne said, could take years because the Sirotins can appeal extradition and because the process itself is long and drawn out, involving state, federal and foreign authorities.

The charges filed against Sirotin involve The Commons, a three-story retail and business complex on South Lake Avenue. Kaufer invested $50,000 in that project, as did his brother, Max. Lang invested $75,000.

In 10 civil suits, investors and creditors of Sirotin’s three projects are seeking more than $134.4 million for alleged acts of fraud, racketeering and non-payment of fees.

In their suits, the investors contend that Sirotin never repaid their investments, nor did he pay the returns of up to 60% he promised on those investments.

Advertisement

Judgments totaling $5.5 million have been awarded in eight other suits against Sirotin, most of them brought by creditors for non-payment of fees. No one in the settled suits has been able to collect a penny from Sirotin, according to their attorneys.

Claimed Law Degree

Sirotin, a self-styled entrepreneur who boasted of receiving a law degree from Columbia University and of successful developments in Madison, Wis., was not all that he claimed, an investigation by The Times found earlier this year.

Sirotin never received a law degree from Columbia, university officials said. And his real estate developments in Wisconsin consisted of a half-finished luxury hotel on the shores of Lake Michigan, a financially troubled office building and court judgments totaling nearly $180,000, mostly for unpaid loans.

And even though the prospects of ever recovering their money remain uncertain for the investors in Sirotin’s Pasadena projects, Lang said last week that he nonetheless feels jubilant about charges being filed against the developer.

“This will be an example to the people who prey on people,” he said. “I don’t know how I’m going to feel if I ever see the man. I don’t have any special hatred for him. To me, this was just something that had to be done.”

Advertisement
Advertisement