Advertisement

Low Turnout Marks Voting for Council, School Posts

Share
Times Staff Writer

Voters in Los Angeles were turning out in unusually low numbers Tuesday for elections affecting nearly half the 15-member Los Angeles City Council as well as five of seven city school board seats and four of seven seats on the Los Angeles Community College District Board of Trustees.

By 4 p.m., fewer than 8% of the city’s registered voters had gone to the polls, although the turnout was substantially higher in the two City Council districts where the most hotly contested elections were being held, the City Clerk’s office said.

The office reported a 16.3% turnout in the 10th District, where 13 candidates were vying for an open seat, and 15.1% in the 6th District, where City Council President Pat Russell was challenged by five opponents.

Advertisement

No Citywide Contests The 7.8% turnout citywide represents about half the number of people who had cast votes by the same time in 1983, when council elections were last held. As in 1983, there are no citywide elections at stake.

The city clerk’s figures were based on a sampling of 75 precincts around the city.

The school board and community college elections were regarded as tests of the strength of the teachers’ unions. Both the public school teachers’ union and the community college union opposed most of the incumbents seeking reelection.

In the 10th District council race, former State Sen. Nate Holden was expected to be in a tight race with three other contenders. They are Homer Broome Jr., a former city public works commissioner and commander in the Los Angeles Police Department who has the support of Mayor Tom Bradley; Myrlie Evers, widow of slain civil rights leader Medgar Evers, and Kenneth M. Orduna, chief of staff for Rep. Mervyn Dymally (D-Compton).

In the 6th District, Russell’s opposition was headed by Ruth Galanter, a 45-year-old planning consultant from Venice, and Patrick McCartney, 38, a journalist also from Venice.

Elsewhere in the city, incumbents Richard Alatorre in the 14th District, Hal Bernson in the 12th District, Robert Farrell in the 8th, John Ferraro in the 4th and Joel Wachs in the 2nd were expected to win reelection in races against generally unknown and under-financed challengers.

In the largely black 10th District, where residents have been without a City Council member for six months, the race started with no clear-cut favorite in a field of 13 contenders. As the campaign wound down, it became a contest between the best-known candidate, Holden, and three well-connected challengers--with some potential spoilers in the background.

Advertisement

Holden relied heavily on his identification with and support from county Supervisor Kenneth Hahn. Holden is on leave from Hahn’s staff. Broome, a former public works commissioner, depended largely on the political backing of Bradley, who once represented the 10th District on the council. Broome was able to raise more money than any of the other candidates.

Evers, another strong candidate during the campaign, depended on the backing of such legislators as State Sen. Diane Watson (D-Los Angeles) and Assemblywoman Maxine Waters (D-Los Angeles). And Orduna had the backing of his old boss, Dymally, in making his first run for elective office.

Links to Machines

But in a campaign where crime and economic revitalization were major issues, Holden and the other leading contenders also had to fend off accusations that they were tied to political machines that only moved into the 10th District when former Councilman David Cunningham resigned last fall.

Holden, Broome, Evers and Orduna moved into the district or re-established residences there last year, and their lesser-known and under-financed rivals hammered away at them at political forums and in a blizzard of last-minute mailings as “carpetbaggers.”

Broome made much of his ties to Bradley and emphasized his record as a former police officer who could tackle the crime problem. The 10th stretches southwest of downtown Los Angeles, across the mid-city neighborhoods and into Palms, an area that was added in the recent redistricting.

In the 6th District, running from Westchester to Venice to Crenshaw, the race presented Russell with the toughest political challenge of her 18-year career on the council.

Advertisement

Led by Galanter and McCartney, Russell’s opponents also included Rimmon C. Fay, 57, a marine biologist and life guard; Salvatore Grammatico, 34, a real estate agent, and businesswoman Virginia Taylor Hughes, 41.

Focus on Growth Issue

Russell’s opposition last year to Proposition U, the popular anti-growth initiative that passed overwhelmingly in her district, gave rise to the belief that she had fallen out of step with her constituents.

Russell, 63, has been the grand dame of the City Council. A confidant of the mayor, twice elected City Council president, mountain climber, marathon runner and grandmother, she went into the race with more money, about $260,000, than all of her opponents combined and a list of political endorsements extending from Bradley to Councilman Zev Yaroslavsky.

Nevertheless, Russell appeared vulnerable. Increasingly identified with a clique of powerful real estate developers and lobbyists, Russell had alienated a number of her constituents and had became a target of the kind of neighborhood-based reform movement that swept her into office in 1969.

But there was more at stake than her career.

Russell was a stalking horse for Bradley, her friend and ally, in an election that tested the popularity of the mayor’s policies on the crucial issues of growth and development.

Alliance With Bradley

The contest pitted the Bradley-Russell preference for measured growth against the strength of a movement, manifested by Proposition U, that warns of the city strangling in its own congestion and pollution.

Advertisement

Bradley, squarely behind Russell, campaigned for her in the week before the election.

The campaign against her focused on her role in massive new development in the district--four projects adding up to several million square feet of offices, stores and homes.

The largest of the developments, just north of Westchester and impinging on the Ballona Wetlands, the city’s only coastal wildlife refuge, would amount to a new town. Called Playa Vista, it would be built on 800 to 900 acres of open land with a projected population of about 30,000.

Russell argued that Playa Vista and the other projects are substantially smaller than they could have been had she not been a forceful advocate of controlled development.

She pointed to her coastal transportation ordinance, which became a model of a citywide law and the best expression, to date, of Bradley’s philosophy of balanced growth. The ordinance permits development to proceed in heavily congested parts of town, but only if developers agree to pay for transportation improvements--from widened streets to new rail lines--necessary to handle the traffic their projects create.

In the San Fernando Valley, Wachs worked to overcome difficulties posed by a new district and by ugly campaign literature that accused him of promoting activities that spread AIDS. A mailer sent to 22,000 homes in the district attacked Wachs for serving as grand marshal of the West Hollywood Gay Pride Parade in 1983.

After redistricting exiled him from the liberal, cosmopolitan constituency he had represented for 16 years and placed him in a conservative, semi-rural district, Wachs campaigned furiously. He appeared before more than 100 community groups, opposed a controversial development in one of the district’s more scenic spots, the Tujunga Wash, and sponsored a country music festival attended by more than 150,000 people.

Advertisement

The 48-year-old Wachs enjoyed a substantial financial advantage over his three opponents. He came into the campaign with more than $600,000 in his campaign treasury and raised $172,000 more, which he used to flood the district with mailers.

In the northwest valley’s 12th District, 56-year-old Bernson, first elected in 1979, was opposed by Richard K. Williams II, an assistant dean of student programs at California State University, Northridge.

Police Tax Fight

In the 8th District, incumbent Farrell, 50, faced five opponents. The biggest issue in that race was Farrell’s sponsorship of a proposed police tax for residents in South Los Angeles.

Under the plan, which will be on the June 2 ballot, property owners served by four Los Angeles Police Department divisions--Newton, Southwest, Southeast and 77th--would pay higher taxes to put 300 more officers on the streets. If it is approved, the average homeowner would pay an estimated $148 a year.

Veteran councilman Ferraro, 62, was seeking a fifth term in the 4th District despite having to run in a redrawn district. Ferraro campaigned by largely ignoring his challenger, Sal Genovese, the owner of a counseling service.

Alatorre, 43, faced two opponents in the Eastside 14th District in his bid to win his first full term in office. Alatorre, a former state assemblyman, had won the council seat in a special election in December, 1985.

Advertisement
Advertisement