Tap to enable a layout that focuses on the article.
Advertisement

Plagiarism

Your editorial asserts that honorable men like King and Bruno engaged in plagiarism--stole others’ work without attribution--but should be excused because they also “left a rich legacy of their own thoughts and deeds.” Academic honesty, you conclude, is really only for the “rest of us” who “will leave a less visible mark on the world.”

Such meandering in the field of ethics leads to a disturbing paradox: The theft of the thoughts of others is pardonable in original thinkers.

GEORGE P. CLARK

Pasadena

Sign up for Essential California

The most important California stories and recommendations in your inbox every morning.

Advertisement
Advertisement