Advertisement

Mistrial Motion in Police Vandalism Case Rejected

Share

Municipal Judge Larry Fidler denied a motion for a mistrial Wednesday in the Dalton Avenue police vandalism case after defendants argued that they could not get a fair trial because a police captain had taken the 5th Amendment and they could not cross-examine him.

But the judge said he will allow the three defendants to choose whether they want the jury to consider Los Angeles Police Det. Robert Clark’s three days of testimony about their own case. Defense attorney Barry Levin, who represents LAPD Officer Todd Parrick, said that decision could conceivably create some “interesting scenarios,” depending on which choice the defendants make. “We could have a situation in the jury room where the jury might say that Clark’s testimony intends to exonerate a certain officer, so we will acquit him. But since we can’t use Clark’s testimony for this other officer, we will have to convict him.”

For the record:

12:00 a.m. May 10, 1991 For the Record
Los Angeles Times Friday May 10, 1991 Home Edition Metro Part B Page 3 Column 2 Metro Desk 2 inches; 37 words Type of Material: Correction
Officer’s rank--It was reported incorrectly Thursday that a Los Angeles police captain invoked his 5th Amendment right against self-incrimination during testimony in the Dalton Avenue police vandalism trial. The officer’s rank, in fact, is that of detective.

Advertisement