Advertisement

BOOK MARK : They Met in Paris, Fell in Political Love and Built a Death Machine

Share

It was a magnificent early autumn afternoon when Saddam Hussein’s Boeing 707 touched down at Orly airport in Paris, decked out for the occasion with the eagle of Saladin, Iraq’s national symbol. The date was Sept. 5, 1975. Jacques Chirac, the French premier, was on hand to greet his visitor. A long red carpet led into the VIP lounge, where champagne and cocktail sandwiches awaited the Iraqi guests. “I welcome you as my personal friend,” Chirac told his visitor. “I assure you of my esteem, my consideration and my affection.”

Touched by this reception, Hussein replied with characteristic modesty. “We hope that the relations France maintains with (other) Arab countries will benefit from the same warmth and cordiality as you have shown today. The relations between our two countries will assuredly improve as a result of my visit, which, I hope, will be beneficial for world peace in general.”

What Hussein didn’t say was that his notion of world peace was one that many in the West would have shunned. For him, and his fellow ideologues in the Baathist Party, peace meant total victory over his enemies, real or imagined; it meant transforming the Middle East, once again, into a killing field.

Advertisement

Like many prophets before them, the early Baathists believed that their prayers would become flesh in the body of a great leader, a man destined to rule the Arab nation with an iron will. Under his leadership, 50 million Arabs would rise up and expel the Jews and the colonial powers from the Middle East. Until then, the Arab world would remain fragmented, weak and submissive.

Hero worship was not the only similarity between the Baathist and Nazi ideologies. Both believed in racial identity, in foreign devils and in war as purification. As Michel Aflak wrote on the eve of his party’s creation, when the ashes of the Nazi dream had not yet gone cold: “Real struggle can never be destruction, negativeness or inaction. It is creativeness, building, a fruitful and positive action.” War was great, the young Baathists surrounding Hussein believed: Long live its purifying fire.

Hussein thus had come to France to seal a strategic pact that would soon translate into massive sales of French arms and the transfer of critical nuclear technologies to Iraq, dramatically accelerating the Middle East arms race and marking the start of Hussein’s ambitious program to acquire nuclear weapons.

Although the 38-year-old Hussein was nominally only second in command of the Baathist regime, the French accorded him all the honors of a head of state. They lodged him at the sumptuous Marigny Palace in Paris, where visiting kings and state presidents stayed. They threw a gala reception in his honor at Versailles. President Valery Giscard d’Estaing invited him to state lunches at the Elysee, and Chirac stuck to him like glue. The five-day trip was a succession of champagne panegyrics. The French wanted Hussein as desperately as Hussein wanted them, for the Iraqi had something they needed to keep their economy afloat: oil. French media pundits, taking a tip from the spin doctors at the Elysee, called it “a marriage of reason.” Today it has become a cliche to speak of arms-for-oil deals, but this is where it all started, as a love affair between France and Iraq.

Chirac had prepared a surprise for his guest: a bullfight through the ruined streets of the medieval town up on the cliffs. The site was sealed off from tourists, bleachers were set up and a large, well-protected bullpen was erected among the crumbled buildings. The village boys trained for days for the jeu de taurillons , which is something of a Provencal tradition. Unlike Spanish bullfights, it involves no bloodshed. It is more of a game, pitting young bulls against the local boys, who scamper around the ring trying to pluck a bright flower from behind the ear of the bull.

“Hussein caught on almost immediately,” an observer recalled. Three times, he bet on the bulls and even promised a prize of one million francs to the boy who could beat the next bull. A few weeks later, an emissary from the Iraqi embassy in Paris came into his office and delivered three checks, each for one million francs. Hussein had come through for the local boys. Soon he would come through for the big boys as well. Over the next 15 years, he would spend $20 billion on French arms. For Hussein, it was the price of independence from the Soviets. For the French, it was a bonanza.

Advertisement

In those years leading up to Hussein’s invasion of Kuwait, various Western businesses and governments helped Iraq assemble one of the most formidable arsenals ever seen in the Middle East. They sold the Iraqis tanks, supersonic fighters, chemical weapons, ballistic missiles and the materials to make an atomic bomb. Altogether, the companies, their bankers and their supporters in government formed a powerful interest group whose principal bond was the creation of a Frankenstein’s monster in the Middle East. Each group contributed in its own way to Hussein’s death machine and lobbied hard to protect the Iraqi connection. The members of this death lobby may have competed fiercely among themselves, but they banded together when it came to defending Iraq.

Throughout this incredible military and industrial buildup, much of which occurred on the open market, never once did a red flag of warning go up in the West. Only four months before the invasion of Kuwait, Assistant Secretary of State John Kelly told Congress that Hussein was a “force of moderation” in the region, just as his predecessors had been saying for years. A more forthright statement of the truth could be found in the corporate balance sheets: Iraq was a great market for France, Germany, Italy, Britain, Austria and the United States. Hussein was our creation, our monster. We built him up and then tried to take him down.

1991 by Kenneth R. Timmerman. Reprinted with permission from Houghton Mifflin.

BOOK REVIEW: “The Death Lobby: How the West Armed Iraq,” by Kenneth R. Timmerman, is reviewed on Page 2 of the Book Review section.

Advertisement